Kimber KS 3035 vs Nordost Valhalla speaker cables

Both are well-made, and how they will perform will depend upon which amplifier and which speakers they are used with (i.e., sometimes the Kimber will sound better and sometimes the Nordost will sound better). Unfortunately, the only way to determine which will work best for you is to try both in your system.

The silver conductor in the Kimber takes a very long time to break in and does not sound right until full break-in is completed (1,000 hours - I used 3038 and 1030 interconnects for four years), so you need to make sure that the cable is fully broken in before you use it.

I prefer the Valhalla. It may be a bit thinner in body and drier in the highs but imaging is much sharper than the Kimbers.

My question is actually kimber 3038 vs Valhalla speaker cables.

My cj pre , amps and sonus Faber strads are velvety smooth and have excellent bass weight

I currently own kimber 3033. They are very good, however I now want a speaker cables that is faster, more extended in the high frequencies, tighter bass and more transparent. Not much to expect right.

I own a couple of Valhalla ic's now and they are fantastic, however they could be seen as a little dry and as much air as some. Is the Valhalla speaker cable similar? From what I have read the speaker cables are better than the Valhalla ic's?
I will be buying s/h.

Any opinions gents?

,