Teo XLR


I notice liquid cables are being talked about a bit at the moment so thought I'd share my experience.

I come from a somewhat cable sceptic background. After playing with modest cables I felt there were differences but it was all pretty subtle. The best I came across were Anti-cables which with everything I've seen seemed to offer slightly greater clarity. They've stayed in my system for the past 3 years as it's evolved.

I run an Emm Labs, Muse amp (very underrated)and Kharma speakers with just an XLR between the electronics. I was offered the opportunity to try a Teo XLR in an unfamiliar system a little while ago and was surprised at the difference it made so at the earliest opportunity I tried them in mine.

I've had them for over a week now and have been surprised at just how big a difference they've made. In a system that I've been very happy with the greater decay and body to notes is a revelation. They've added a more natural perspective that I didn't know I was missing. Very impressive.
defride
Cue The Police:

Every breath you take
And every move you make
Every bond you break, every step you take
I'll be watching you

Every single day
And every word you say
Every game you play, every night you stay
I'll be watching you

Oh can't you see
You belong to me
How my poor heart aches
With every step you take

Every move you make
And every vow you break
Every smile you fake, every claim you stake
I'll be watching you

...et cetera...
Sab,

You fell for the HD cable hype from XYZ that Ghost has clearly uncovered and ordered them. I hope you enjoy them and as much as we Teo owners enjoy ours. You will have to worry about them leaking Italian wine though. =8^D
Sab,

22 has given enough info to put one at ease concerning a leaky toxic Teo cable. It's just is not there. Can we move on and please report back your feedback on the HD cables you have coming on the praise of XYZ.

If you want I can send you my Teo STD IC to A/B. =8^D
Fiddler,
With all due respect, the first part of your reply is a non sequitur regarding the second part of your reply. You are talking apples and oranges.

On the one hand you are referring to my over 50 years of audio experience which is irrelevant to a discussion of the points I am making. In my opinion, this is a diversion from staying on topic and remaining focused on my points -- which have yet to be rebutted.

On the other hand, you are referring to Taras22 who asked specifically for the points I was making and then refused to answer them when I replied to him quite specifically.

Furthermore, my refusal to tell my personal history -- I am not a dealer and do not owe this to the forum -- has absolutely nothing to do with Taras22 asking for my points then stating he will not respond after I offered them here. This is the issue at hand -- not my curriculum vitae. IMO.

With all due respect, the word hypocrisy is not appropriate here -- and the tone of your reply is also inappropriate. IMO.