Is DEQX a game changer?

isn't DEQX only for digital sources? Would anyone choose to use it in an otherwise analogue vinyl setup?

sorry, didn't see the response above to this ?

DEQX Update: I used an extra XLR connector from another application to hook up the Ref CD-8 CDP digital output directly into the DEQX via the XLR D4 input socket. The acoustic sound presentation is similar, but the DEQX DAC function produces a somewhat sharper image and sound stage.

Getting a little nervous here. What happens if I try a direct DEQX analogue hook-up from my phono pre???

What happens to my ARC Ref 5 SE???

Al ... are you following this? I need some independent validation. I am trying to adapt to some major paradigm shifts here.

Bruce & Lloyd,

A couple of comments that were made earlier by some of the experienced DEQX users who have been making outstanding contributions to the thread:

08-28-14: Drewan77
DEQX is also an excellent preamp, completely neutral and very analogue sounding to my ears (I play a lot of vinyl) and also contains very good DACs (only bettered by a new Graham Slee product called the Majestic. I had previously used a Chord 64 and the DEQX DAC was much more musical, the Slee even more so).

08-28-14: Psag
Another amazing aspect is that the preamp section is utterly transparent, to my ear, with an analog source.
[Although Psag noted on 9-18 that "For CD and vinyl, I continue to use my tubed preamp."]

09-17-14: Drewan77
I used to use DEQX for both analogue/digital, now only analogue (although it contains an excellent DAC, I now use something even better). The two analogue inputs are configured as below

1) RCA Phono analogue input: Turntable/phono amp
2) XLR Balanced analogue input: balanced connection to Graham Slee Majestic DAC/preamp. This has an analogue input that I use for SACD/second TT, plus multiple digital inputs (coax, optical, USB) for the CD transport/digital streamer/laptop etc.

I also use the DEQX analogue volume control. Overall there is no trace of anything 'digital' in the sound I hear which is a testament to the smoothness of the DEQX processor. You have to hear it to believe me of course!

Having reviewed the information provided at the DEQX site pretty thoroughly, I see no reason whatsoever to question their observations, putting aside dogmatic biases some may have against the A/D conversion which the DEQX performs internally when provided with an analog input.

What happens to my ARC Ref 5 SE???

That was the point to the question in my previous post. Based on everything that has been said in this thread, and on the info provided at the DEQX site, it seems to me to be highly conceivable that you may get results that are as good or better with it removed from the system than you are now getting with it in the system, albeit perhaps with some slight further tweaking of the DEQX settings.

In which case you could sell the ARC preamp and perhaps more than recover the amount you paid for the DEQX.

Best regards,
-- Al

Al, you and I are both old enough to know that some questions are best not asked. I'm "freeze tagging" on the DEQX's analogue functionality viz my phono. The thought that my Ref 5 SE could be an irrelevant artifact is too difficult to bear.

I had the same reaction when Excel/Lotis spreadsheet software obsoleted 14 column spreadsheet paper. To this day, I refuse to use Excel. I ask the kids to run my spreadsheets when I need that work done. I love my 14 column spreadsheets, white vinyl eraser and Pentel .5mm mechanical pencil. Even to this day, nobody can run a "10-key" faster than me.