Marsh A400 vs Bryston 4B-ST

In a direct comparison that I heard the Marsh sounded more musical and detailed. It also sounded subjectively like it has more power. The Bryston, of course, has the better warranty.

I was considering a Marsh but then found that they are made in Taiwan, that is all I am going to say about that.

I have listened to both amps and for my ears I have purchased the Marsh. It is a wonderful amp for the money.
I don't care where the amp was made. After I had a peek under the hood at a local dealer I was impressed at the build quality and calibre of parts used in the amp. You could spend much more and do alot worse. The Bryston is a fine amp with the best warranty and built like a tank. Sonically, I felt the Marsh was better and I drive some hard to drive electrostatics. Listen to both and let your ears decide.

If it is warranty and build quality you are after...i'd have to say go with the Bryston. If you want the best sound (as did I) go with the Marsh!!