Is computer audio a bust?


In recent months, I have had several audio acquaintances return to CDPs claiming improved SQ versus their highly optimized computer transports (SS drives, external power supplies, etc, etc).

I wanted to poll people on their experiences with computer "transports." What variables have had the most impact on sonics? If you bailed on computers, why?

I personally have always believed that the transport, whether its a plastic disc spinner or computer, is as or more important than the dac itself and thus considerable thought and energy is required.

agear
OR just take the easy way out and blame the product or format or technology in general. Much easier that way....
08-06-14: Audiolabyrinth
one more time!, computer audio is a bust!

Ha! At least your a good natured troll with a sense of humor....

For the record, I agree with your statements about the influence of cabling. I have experienced it too. Happy listening....
08-06-14: Cerrot
Computer audio via USB is an absolute BUST! USB is for connecting peripherials - not for music!

I know a lot of people who feel that way including an engineer who designs outstanding digital front ends (Exemplar Audio).....

So, that begs the question as to WHAT IS NECESSARY to make USB work?

Galvanic isolation?
Asynchronous streaming?
Isolation of power and data within cabling (Light Harmonic, etc)
Active reconstruction after the fact (BMC Pure USB cable)

What????
I've petitioned congress to create national "Computer Audio is Dead!" and "USB cables should not be used for anything except tying shoes!" days for Audiolabyrinth and Cerrot, respectively. I admire Agear and others for attempting honest, rational discourse, but I'm quite certain that Audiolabyrinth and Cerrot are as interested in discussing both sides of the issue as John Corzine is in talking about where the missing MF Global money went. You guys can keep trying, but you'll probably have better luck getting the neighbor's dog to explain why he picked the last place he excreted his breakfast.