JHunter asked...
- are all the systems used for published DBTs inadequate?
Yes, IMHO, based upon those articles that I have read (which may or may not be all of them) the systems that were used are/were wholly inadquate on a number of levels.
There are also questions about other factors.
No, the tests are not worthless, but they are only valid for the test conditions - I object to these tests being used to draw wide ranging genralized conclusions.
I do not object to the DBT/ABX methodology, as far as it goes. It is certainly a methodology that does *test* something and do it reliably. What it is testing is still a big question! :- )
I personally have not tried Pink Noise in a DBT test. I am certainly willing to do so, and if someone out there wants to ante up a few $$ and some time and effort it can be made to happen... Since I'm short on both time and $$, I can't be an audio philanthropist for this one. If someone reasonably local to the NY/Phila/Boston axis wants to do such tests, I'd be willing to try to participate and lend whatever expertise I might be able to bring to bear.
Again, the differences that at least I am talking about are ones of *clarity* in the sense that information is easier to recognize. Since you *can* already recognize the information with what I will call "less than optimal" equipment/cables, this is a difficult thing to test - since the difference is one of *effort* on the part of the listener's brain!
I think this is really where the problem lies...
_-_-bear (bearlabsUSA.com)
- are all the systems used for published DBTs inadequate?
Yes, IMHO, based upon those articles that I have read (which may or may not be all of them) the systems that were used are/were wholly inadquate on a number of levels.
There are also questions about other factors.
No, the tests are not worthless, but they are only valid for the test conditions - I object to these tests being used to draw wide ranging genralized conclusions.
I do not object to the DBT/ABX methodology, as far as it goes. It is certainly a methodology that does *test* something and do it reliably. What it is testing is still a big question! :- )
I personally have not tried Pink Noise in a DBT test. I am certainly willing to do so, and if someone out there wants to ante up a few $$ and some time and effort it can be made to happen... Since I'm short on both time and $$, I can't be an audio philanthropist for this one. If someone reasonably local to the NY/Phila/Boston axis wants to do such tests, I'd be willing to try to participate and lend whatever expertise I might be able to bring to bear.
Again, the differences that at least I am talking about are ones of *clarity* in the sense that information is easier to recognize. Since you *can* already recognize the information with what I will call "less than optimal" equipment/cables, this is a difficult thing to test - since the difference is one of *effort* on the part of the listener's brain!
I think this is really where the problem lies...
_-_-bear (bearlabsUSA.com)