Is computer audio a bust?


In recent months, I have had several audio acquaintances return to CDPs claiming improved SQ versus their highly optimized computer transports (SS drives, external power supplies, etc, etc).

I wanted to poll people on their experiences with computer "transports." What variables have had the most impact on sonics? If you bailed on computers, why?

I personally have always believed that the transport, whether its a plastic disc spinner or computer, is as or more important than the dac itself and thus considerable thought and energy is required.

agear
08-24-14: Charles1dad
Hi Agear,
Have the Aries and Lampizator level 7 met or exceeded your lofty expectations? A DHT(EML 45 tube) DAC is very interesting.Congratulations.

above average....;)
08-31-14: Jesusa0
Matt,

I celebrate you´re going to try the DACs with a superior transport (Esoteric). My experience taught me that my Esoteric UX-1 plus the Yamamoto YDA-01 DAC beat, by a large margin, a MacBook Pro plus the same Yamamoto. Conclusion: I quit computer audio.

My SPDIF cable is an Antipodes Audio Kokiri.

Regards,

Daniel

Yet again on another thread. So, is unmodded computer audio a bust?
Hello Agear,

As you quoted me from another thread, I think I have to be accurate.

My computer had some enhancements such as:

1.- External USB power supply (a noticeable sonic improvement);

2.- USB to SPDIF converter. To my ears better resolution than connecting USB straight to DAC.

3.- External hard drive;

4.- 24/88 files;

Even though those enhancements, I preferred the sound coming from the Esoteric UX-1 playing 16/44 redbook CDs (of course, the Yamamoto YDA-01 DAC is a must).

Regards,

Daniel
Jesusa0,
A good friend has brought several well regarded players/DACs to my home and so far he always prefers the Yamamoto YDA in the end. It very much flies under the radar.
Charles1dad, I just read the 6Moons review. Wow! I didn't have time to note what chip is in it, but I would love to hear it.