2. digital
  3. 970208237

DVD w DAC or NEW CD PLAYER???

I am currently using my Pioneer DV-525 as a CD player for my system what comprises of Musical Fidelity MA65 monoblocks, Carver preamp, Celestion SL6si with Target Stands. My system currently sounds so pathetic and dull, unlike when I had my Sony ES CD player (sounded so lifelike). I recently visited the most high end shop audio shop in Manila (they sell Krell, Jadis, Classe and other high end audio products) and asked for their opinion. The part owner told me that going for a new CD player would be a better option, but with my budget I could go only with a Pioneer w/ stable platter mechanism (widely used in Hi-End CD player mechanism as Wadia) or get a Musical Fidelity 24K DAC. He said "DVD players really suck when playing regular CDs, but when you play a music DVDs its a totally different story! Your Pioneer DVD might blow off our other expensive CD players, DVD players can never outperform regular CD players when playing regular CDs, you might be wasting your money to purchase a DAC!" Funny because the shop had many different DACs on their shelf, but he recommends it to more expensive transports. He said simplier is better and would sound. I am so confused if I should go for the Musical Fidelity 24K with my Pioneer DV-525 or just buy the Pioneer stable platter mechanism CD player?
eeugenio
kthomas
911 posts
 
I haven't tried a bunch of different transports, so for all I know they do sound different. But if they do sound different, I still wouldn't pay a bunch of money for a "high-quality" one - the ability to get bits from a CD off to another physical point (literally anywhere in the world) in bit-perfect form at CD-playback rates is a completely solved problem. If audio CD transports don't perform this function today then our response as consumers shouldn't be to buy very expensive versions of a transport. You can use your computer with it's $69 CD player to perform this, albeit somewhat clumsily at this point in time. But the manufacturers will come up with convergent products that provide this functionality cheaply. So, unless you have a transport that does some sort of filtering algorithm (ie bit-twiddling), a high-end transport has no technical reason for existing any longer, and if it does have some sort of filtering algorithm, buying an expensive transport is akin to buying the most expensive piece of software you've ever purchased.
j_k
234 posts
 
The technical reason is the mechanics (stability, rigidity)of the transport and the ability to clock the data bits out without jitter. Circuit topology, parts stability & quality, power supplies and many other details make the difference between a 10K transport and a DVD player from best buy. Yes, some of it is the case and sexy CD tray... I used to think the same way, until I heard the difference -- and the CD format is not yet completely refined. If there was no difference in sound, companies like Linn and a few others could not get away with peddling 20K CD only players with with waiting lists.
kthomas
911 posts
 
J_k: I understand that there are reasons given for why one transport sounds different than others, and that additional cost / engineering can widen the gap. I've never experimented with different transports, so I won't state with any authority that "they all sound the same". However, if it is true that it costs a fair amount of money to accomplish bit-perfect transmission in an audio product, I'd argue that we, as music lovers / audiophiles, should be demanding a better interface, since the same feat is easily accomplished with a computer using cheap (throwaway) parts. I can get bit-perfect copies of data across my house at much higher data rates than a CD requires using extremely cheap pieces over a home LAN. It just seems like a complete throw-away of money to pay top dollar today for anyone's audio version of handling bits.
More to discover