Are Nordost really the Rolls Royce of cables?


Ive never heard them. Thanks.
darrylhifi
Thank you, Fatparrot, As I could not mention that in my thread, because audiogon would of not posted my responce. I am also a dealer for 7 other cables manufactures, wich I really dont care for, as I see no overwhelming responce from customers feedback on cables they purchased. I like selling cables that work, cables people enjoy, cables that people say "WOW". Cables that can extract every bit of information your gear is capable of producing. And justifying the expence, it is worth every cent.
Calling Nordost the 'Rolls Royce' of cables is too general a term. Nordost makes cables at a lot of different price points. Rolls Royce price points are consiberly less varied.

This being said, the Nordost line starts at the $100/meter Solar Wind. $100 for an interconnect is not too far from mass market entry level Monster cables. Monster might have a few lines a bit less expensive per meter, but not many.

Thus, to continue the car analogy, Nordost may not make Toyota Echo price range cables, but they certainly make affordable Honda Accord cables. They also make Rolls Royce priced cables (Valhala).

One thing I really like about Nordost is that they do not mess around with their product line until they develop a cable that is CLEARLY superior. I find too many cable companyies like playing with their cables way too much. Not to mention that it does not take a brain surgeon to make cable... HOWEVER, it does take high technology and science to produce a cable a cut above all the people who are doing it themselves by hand at home. Nordost uses high technology and science to develop their cables.

Now some folks have compared Nordost to Audioquest... I find this kind of an amusing comparison. If I remember correctly Audioquest OWNS Nordost. For this reason alone, I have heard several pwople boycott Nordost.

Frankly, I was never a Nordost fan until I heard the Quattro Fil. I shot out the Quattro Fil vs. the Acoustiz Zen Silver Reference in my system, and the Nordost triumphed IMHO. Though the victory was by a small margin, the Nordost were more detailed and more precise cables. The AZ were a little more deminsional.

Then I proceeded to compare the AZ Satori speaker cable with the Nordost SPM cable. No comparison folks. Before this trial I thought that speaker cable made the least ammount of difference in a system (in the signal path). The SPM was the biggest improvements I have made in my system in a long time. It was as if a haze was lifted from my soundsystem and music then flowed from my speakers.

Many of my friends have used other less expensive Nordost cables, and many of them love the stuff for the price point they can get it at.

One thing someone who wants to upgrade IC's needs to ask themselves (before they go ount and plunk down serious cash) is will it be an imrpovement in their system? Do their components justify the better IC? or Will their components be able to take advantage of the new cables? These are important questions. It took me a long time to learn, but in audio the GARBAGE IN GARBAGE OUT rule applies in spades. System matching and balance is the key to getting good sound. A $1k sound system should not be using Nordost Valhalla cables. Solar Wind yes... not Quattro Fil either.

Valhalla (especially) and Quattro Fil will expose your ears to your components in your system to such a degree that these cables may make it sound too bright or even harsh. These are your components sounds... upgrade them before you start on reference interconnects and speaker cables.
Quatrofil and Valhalla are awesome, friggin supernatural.

That said, if your system is already overly bright these might not be the ones for you.

Oddly, I found that I can be happy with cheaper speaker cables (Analysis Plus Oval 9 work fine in my system) but no interconnects I've tried come close to the Quatrofil. I don't know why. I have had good success with Goertz Silver Sapphire and Harmonic Tech Silway II at a fraction of the cost of Quattrofil but at used prices I prefer the Quattrofil.
Art
it is entirely possible that some who have not liked the quatro fil, found them to be so objectionable because they revealed how truly awful their system actually was...
Bob bundus you have it backwards.
I had JPS Superconductor + Audioquest Opal Wireworld Gold Eclipse III Coincident CST Nordsot Quattro Fil in my humble system. The Wireworld Gold Eclipse was the winner but it was just so little better than the Coincident that for 1/5th the cost the Coincident was a no Brainer. Everyone chose the Nordost Quattro Fil Last of the bunch.The JPS was very good also as was the Opal. The Quattro was not up to snuff.
Goes to show you that Nordsot is the best marketers in the BIZ. In ttodays world is is not the best product that wins Its the product that is best marketed. Nordost is the BOSE of the cable bussines. They with clever marketing have people convinced that $ equate to better sound. A total mis representation.
When I got back in this crazy hobby 4 years ago i thought that way.
Then I would go listen to big buck systems and leave feeling empty.
The I would go listen to a 5K system and my feet would start tapping. I was confused at first.
How could this be. Well it was a reality. Big bucks did not allways mean great sound.
Then as time went on i realized there is a big group of people out there that are into bragging on how much they spend.
And the Nordost of the world to relieve these people of the money they need to spend so they can brag.
Have had more than a few of these types come over listen to my humble system and go home wondering why there 20 30 50 75 K systems dont sound as musical as mine.
Simple I put things toghther based on how they sounded.
They just figured more money more money better sound. Wrong.