Why is Double Blind Testing Controversial?


I noticed that the concept of "double blind testing" of cables is a controversial topic. Why? A/B switching seems like the only definitive way of determining how one cable compares to another, or any other component such as speakers, for example. While A/B testing (and particularly double blind testing, where you don't know which cable is A or B) does not show the long term listenability of a cable or other component, it does show the specific and immediate differences between the two. It shows the differences, if at all, how slight they are, how important, etc. It seems obvious that without knowing which cable you are listening to, you eliminate bias and preconceived notions as well. So, why is this a controversial notion?
moto_man
Tinged spectacles. Are we getting carried away with this? What's next white canes and seeing eye dogs. At least the dogs might be able to confirm extreme frequency responses as well as finding the stuff that really stinks.
did I hit a nerve ? Or did I miss sarcasm in Redkiwi's response ? It was a joke guys .. let's laugh at ourselves occasionally. HiFi is a very unimportant topic in a world full of war, famine and death, and certainly not worth getting worked up about.
This is exactly why this topic is off limits at Audio Asylum. I think Audiogon should follow their excellent lead.
Huh? Redkiwi and Seandt were obviously joking. None of the recent posters seem upset. And, this topic is only off limits in the cable asylum. No rule against mentioning or discussing DBT's in the general or other specialized asylums.

Simple courtesy should be sufficient here. If someone asks, as in the initiation of this thread, "what's so bad about DBT's?," it should be obvious that he doesnt think anything is wrong with the subject, and if someone does, he might either ignore the thread or give his point of view without picking a fight.
Banning topics such as this is a very bad idea. Despite limited regressions into philosophy and politics Audiogon has consistently shown that intelligent and polite dialog regarding audio is possible.