Okay hmmm... I found the article - and it was on AUDIOGON, of all places!
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/frr.pl?ranlg&1034089946&read&3&4&
Here is a direct quote;
For the down-sides, there is a hint of edge on some vocals, especially ones that are already edgy voices. It is not the last word in "smoothness" but it is certainly not bad here. It could be a little better though. There is a very slight hint of some upper midrange coloration, like the standard 103 has, but much less. The lighter coils create a slight rise in amplitude over 15kHz, that the standard DL103 does not have. I did not find this to be problematic, although those with a "hot" tweeter may not like this. The low compliance of this cartridge is not compatible with all tonearms. It likes a heavier arm, and really does perform better with gimbal arms. Heavier unipivots, or ones with damping and stabilizing may work, though.
I was all set to get one - but this kind of threw me a bit - since my tweeters tend to be a bit on the spikey side.
Reflections?
http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/frr.pl?ranlg&1034089946&read&3&4&
Here is a direct quote;
For the down-sides, there is a hint of edge on some vocals, especially ones that are already edgy voices. It is not the last word in "smoothness" but it is certainly not bad here. It could be a little better though. There is a very slight hint of some upper midrange coloration, like the standard 103 has, but much less. The lighter coils create a slight rise in amplitude over 15kHz, that the standard DL103 does not have. I did not find this to be problematic, although those with a "hot" tweeter may not like this. The low compliance of this cartridge is not compatible with all tonearms. It likes a heavier arm, and really does perform better with gimbal arms. Heavier unipivots, or ones with damping and stabilizing may work, though.
I was all set to get one - but this kind of threw me a bit - since my tweeters tend to be a bit on the spikey side.
Reflections?