Since bi-wiring is essentially just a very long jumper (back to the amp connectors), I can only theorize that true improvements are made through wire matching to the frequency and current requirements of the component speaker loads (since both sets of wire start at the same place on the amp).
I propose that a wire composition, wind and guage matched to the portion of the speaker load would be required as compared to simple duplication of the wire from the amp to the x-over. Maybe a large guage, few strand, copper based wire for the low end, high current and a multi-strand, silver, smaller guage wire for the high frequency, lower current high end? (sort of an inductance matching effect?)
Your thoughts and/or test results are appreciated.
P.S. I just bought a pair of Maggie 3.6Rs and am considering bi-wiring, but find it hard to understand the "normal" bi-wire solutions vice simple good jumpers.
I propose that a wire composition, wind and guage matched to the portion of the speaker load would be required as compared to simple duplication of the wire from the amp to the x-over. Maybe a large guage, few strand, copper based wire for the low end, high current and a multi-strand, silver, smaller guage wire for the high frequency, lower current high end? (sort of an inductance matching effect?)
Your thoughts and/or test results are appreciated.
P.S. I just bought a pair of Maggie 3.6Rs and am considering bi-wiring, but find it hard to understand the "normal" bi-wire solutions vice simple good jumpers.