As a general rule, I do not listen to the so-called and much vaunted 'audiophile' recordings, especially in light of my generally esoteric and eclectic musical tastes. That aside, I do appreciate a well-recorded disc and have encountered a few lesser known labels that should make an audiophile system proud. Water Lily Acoustics recordings are rather nice and CIMP, a label focusing on modern jazz leaning towards the avant-garde fringes, prides itself on the quality of their recordings. Some of the modern electronica is also very nicely recorded...Burnt Friedman's Nonplace label jumps to mind, although there are many others within that particular genre. I've also been very surprised at how truly excellent the current CD releases of the British folk artists from the 60's-70's sound. This may be a testament to the quality of the original recordings or the dedication of the labels releasing the material. Either way, the discs I have from folks like Davy Graham, Mike Cooper, Wizz Jones, Bert Jansch, etc. are all top notch and full of excellent music to boot.
The best and worst "audiophile music"
Being iced in here in Dallas and feeling inspired after reading Art Dudley's "Listening" column in the new Stereopile, I've been reconsidering why I buy the recordings I do. You know the disks I'm talking about. The ones recommended in the audio rags and by dealers and other audiophiles. I've bought a bunch of them, and most are just lousy. The original music (and/or the performers) may or may not be any good, but the recordings are often quite strange. Are there any that you actually enjoy for the music? Which ones do you think are the worst, and why?
- ...
- 5 posts total
- 5 posts total