2. cables
  3. 1107481567

is interconnect more important than speaker cable

Hi,

I have often heard from audiophiles and dealers that you spend more money on your interconnects than your speaker cables because they are more important for your system.

Does anyone venture to guess why people say that?

I still have my Nordost Red Dawn Speaker cables but have my final pieces for the rest of my system so its time for me to possibly upgrade it but not sure if worthwhile. I am very happy with system and would prefer of course to avoid upgrading the speaker cable to Nordost Valhalla to match my xlr interconnect.

Present system

Wilson Watt Puppy 7
Rowland 302 amp
Emmlabs DCC2 (dac/preamp) kimber kable power supply
Emmlabs CDSD (transport.....using emmlabs optic cable to connect to dcc2)...kimber kable power supply
Nordost Valhalla to connect amp to preamp
Nordost Red Dawn Speaker Cables
128x128karmapolice
clbeanz
192 posts
 
I've read speaker cable was the more critical.Because,most amplifiers have low output impedence,and speakers are also low impedence(dynamic impedence as well),so cable length and construction can cause large effect to that relationship.
Versus...
Most sources or preamps have high input impedence(10-50k ohms)and low(75-300ohm)output impedence.So you typically end up with good drive and low impedence into stable high impedence inputs.
pops
2,273 posts
 
Fatparrot, do you prefer the weather in AZ or MA? :-)
fatparrot
1,314 posts
 
Pops, do you prefer your system, or a Bose system? :-)
pops
2,273 posts
 
I see what ya mean! I go to Boston about every 4 weeks on biz and just can't believe how brutal winters are!
eldartford
4,262 posts
 
Fatparrot...As a stockholder, I'd prefer Bose.

Pops...Brutal winters do make for good football teams.
And besides, only Massachusetts could bring you John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, and...oh never mind.
More to discover