>>Is all this true? who knows.<<
Talon -- we agree on a lot of things! Congrats on your system, I'm glad you've found stuff with which you're happy.
Was your FTM4-sg shielded?
Did you replace some other gear and is that why you were able to switch to balanced interconnects?
Are you saying you were already a purchaser of Siltech interconnects, bought more and you were unaware that Siltech's major marketing angle is that they claim to reduce EMI and RF inteferrence with their shielding?
Again -- I am glad you're happy and I am not going to try to talk you out of those cables -- that ain't what I am about at all.
But, for me, I would want to see some of these measurements and comparisons to see what they're talking about.
On their web-site, they claim ---
"For the first time in studio cable history, many of these improvements can be measured and proven."
Yet, they fail to give measurements or any back-up to "prove" their claim.
Shielding against EMI and RF is extremely common in interconnects.
Sort of like Vitamin D in milk.
There's nothing in their literature to explain how other cable shielding is noisy, which cables they are comparing, etc.
If what they say is true, I wonder why they wouldn't include this information.
They claim it can be measured proven, then they don't measure or prove it.
All pretty vague.
Talon -- we agree on a lot of things! Congrats on your system, I'm glad you've found stuff with which you're happy.
Was your FTM4-sg shielded?
Did you replace some other gear and is that why you were able to switch to balanced interconnects?
Are you saying you were already a purchaser of Siltech interconnects, bought more and you were unaware that Siltech's major marketing angle is that they claim to reduce EMI and RF inteferrence with their shielding?
Again -- I am glad you're happy and I am not going to try to talk you out of those cables -- that ain't what I am about at all.
But, for me, I would want to see some of these measurements and comparisons to see what they're talking about.
On their web-site, they claim ---
"For the first time in studio cable history, many of these improvements can be measured and proven."
Yet, they fail to give measurements or any back-up to "prove" their claim.
Shielding against EMI and RF is extremely common in interconnects.
Sort of like Vitamin D in milk.
There's nothing in their literature to explain how other cable shielding is noisy, which cables they are comparing, etc.
If what they say is true, I wonder why they wouldn't include this information.
They claim it can be measured proven, then they don't measure or prove it.
All pretty vague.