No, but it will encourage folks to treat his post in kind ---
>>recommend something that does well in blind testings<<
Which cable would that be? I'd love to see the blind studies to which you
refer.
>>How come so few people know how much a zipcord pair sucks for
inductance?<<
Sucks, as in causes as audible problem -- one that can be heard in blind
studies, since that is your criteria? Maybe because this has never been
established. This seems to be something you either read in a cable ad or
heard and believed. What sucks for inductance are cables with the positive
and negative separated.
>>smaller gauge is better for frequency response?<<
This also must have come directly from a cable ad -- where's the blind tests
or any other kind of scientific back-up for such a notion?
>>Think outside the marketing jargon box....So much misinformation.<<
Yes -- much of it located in your post.
Geesh.
>>recommend something that does well in blind testings<<
Which cable would that be? I'd love to see the blind studies to which you
refer.
>>How come so few people know how much a zipcord pair sucks for
inductance?<<
Sucks, as in causes as audible problem -- one that can be heard in blind
studies, since that is your criteria? Maybe because this has never been
established. This seems to be something you either read in a cable ad or
heard and believed. What sucks for inductance are cables with the positive
and negative separated.
>>smaller gauge is better for frequency response?<<
This also must have come directly from a cable ad -- where's the blind tests
or any other kind of scientific back-up for such a notion?
>>Think outside the marketing jargon box....So much misinformation.<<
Yes -- much of it located in your post.
Geesh.