SACD 2...for those who have not heard


Bad news as far as I am concerned, just what we don't need.
http:/www.highfidelityreview.com/news/news.asp?newsnumber=19363192
ears
They don't care about audiophiles. They're in business to make money. To do that they need a wider audience. It's very simple.
No, you have it backwards, without audiophiles, sacd would not exsist.
Average joes are still not buying sacd's, and putting a picture on the screen is not about to change that.
If you need further convincing, check the dvd-a sales.

My thoughts are, if there is video or picture stills, or whatever on the disc, then something has to be downgraded like resolution, or possibily no redbook layer.
Either of these two things will deter sales of hardware and software.

As far as the first gen players being compatible to sacd software and current software being compatible whith future sacd 2 hardware....i don't see this as being a problem.
There is already a space set aside on the SACD layer for text and graphics, so it wouldn't require anything else to suffer.