Any reccomendations for a CD burner?

In this community, role of DAC is usually considered important enough to pay several grands, or even more. However when the subject is not DAC, but ADC (A/D converter), many agree to go with incomparably cheaper solutions. Just curious why it happens? A/D affects reproduction quality not less than DAC... Would anyone using M-audio consider to downgrade his Theta Gen VIII to $100 DAC?

i've had a standalone tascam cdrw 700 for 5 yrs now, have burned over 2000 discs, and haven't had a problem (though i just found that verbatim discs don't work in it; a first!).

can defeat SCMS with the unit too!

The M-audio, Berringer, Edirol, Flying Cow ect. are not nearly as good as the other options listed. These units are made with price as the selling point, thus the parts are usually compromised.

FYIW, Oade's do modify the Edirol, which might be a cheap option. For more info go to their web site.

Dmitry ... I think you get two different audiences. If the poster wanted to archive LPs to CDs with optimum sound quality then maybe a multi-thousand dollar ADC is required, or the alesis. However if they just want to listen to LPs on a discman, in the car etc then a cheaper ADC is quite acceptable.

I think ADC effects are probably just as pronounced as DAC in the sound chain, but, as in all parts of audio the laws of diminshing returns apply, as does the requirement to buy something fit for purpose, and not necessarily the most expensive.

Considering the Alesis is an all in one unit and can operate as a nice player too, I would not conider it "high" cost. For $1000, you get a hard drive, CD burner, dedicated high rez burner and a very good playback unit.

Depending on what the poster uses for CD playback he may be able to sell it and just use the Alesis. Or if he uses a DA he can dump his transport and keep the DA for the Alesis.

Other than that, there are a dozen and a half cheap stand alone units that will make CD copies......from $200 on up.