DVD-A question

1. Both of the DVD-A players I've owned allow you to preselect what the player will do to the disc. Even now mine just play without any television.
2. If you preprogram the player, you don't get any of the menu music.
3. DVD-As contain separate 2- and multichannel tracks.

YOUR DVD-A music may be dead, but mine isn't. The classical labels I buy still release music and I still buy it.

I prefer the sound of DVD-A to SACD, as do both of my 'multichannel friends'. Among other reasons, I find many SACDs to have a MUCH higher noise floor than ANY DVD-A.
.

3. DVD-As CAN contain separate stereo and MCH tracks but some do not. (Lately, it seems that is true for SACD as well.)

Also, I have added a 6" LCD monitor to my rack for use in programming the player and for program selection when necessary. It is unobtrusive and cheap and saves me lots of frustration.

Finally, I tend to prefer SACDs because there are many more classical releases compared with DVD-A. YMMV.

Kal

1... As Jeffreybehr says, you don't require a video screen to play a DVDA. You do need it for setup. The solution is to go out and buy a little (13") cheap ($89) TV and put it in your equipment rack.

2...I think the "snippet" problem is the disc. I have not had this problem with any of several players and many discs. However, with the Denon 2900, some discs start themselves when the drawer closes, and others require me to push PLAY.

3...There are no multiple layers on a DVDA. I think that the DVDA protocol creates a stereo program by real time (in the player) mixdown of the multichannel program, although there is also provision for a stereo-only program with higher (196 vs 96) sample rate. (I have no stereo-only discs). All stereo programs (CD, LP, etc) are made by mixdown from many (24 or so) tracks, so the idea of making the final mix in the player seems OK to me. I think that coefficients for this mixdown are encoded on the disc and used by the player. Also, the multichannel playback involves coefficients that can be used to provide different "perspectives"...close up (called "stage") and distant (called "audience").

I have good and bad (audiowise) recordings, SACD, DVDA, CD, and LP. My best DVDA are superior to the best SACD and CD. (You can draw your own opinion of LP).

And the video material, interviews and program notes, are sometimes interesting (even on my little 13" monitor).

#1 - depends on the player
#2 - As above
#3 - depends on the disk - some have both DVDA multi channel and DVDA stereo (both in various combinations of resolution and frequency) All disks usually have a DD5.1 layer that will play on an ordinary DVD player and a prologic layer for 2 channel digital out. Some also include DTS5.1

My biggest irritant with this format is the fact that there doesn't seem to be any standard for the players or the disks - you get silverline releases which are no higher quality than DTS and rhino which are higher resolution more to the DVDA standard. More video and track type options with DVDA though - which could be viewed as a good thing by some. Get a good combo player and you will be safe (for a while anyway) As far as releases go - I'm in to rock/pop and SACD seems to be ahead in new and upcoming releases these days