2. speakers
  3. 998367807

ML reQuest/ SL3 Owners: Seeking Advice

I am moving from a small to a larger room (16'x28") and am considering buying a full range speaker. I have leaned towards panels and in the past have owned Quads and Magnepans. Also,I want to keep my ARC LS25 and VT100MKII (which I recently have been in the process of auditioning with the reQuests,SL3's, and Vandersteen Sig 3's). I really like the reQuests in my relatively brief auditions and am curious about current ML owners' long-term satisfaction with M.L.'s. Would you buy them again?
dem
davebachmann
94 posts
 
Yet another satisfied user checking in. My system is listed at the Asylum(http://cgi.audioasylum.com/systems/830.html). I continue to discover more in the music as I listen to the SL3s and with each succeeding upgrade I've made. There are a pair of McCormack monoblocks that I have my eye on and a REL sub may come in the future, but nothing is required as much as wanted to satisfy the curiosity - such is the nature of our passion.
guitarman_1's avatar
guitarman_1
4 posts
 
I will throw in my 2 cents worth.I have owned all the logan line except the prodigy and up.for my money the maggies are
a better match for your gear.the 3.6 will blow away the SL3.
I do love the logans,but they are dinamically restricted in the top end,and the bass is not the same quality as the maggies.If you like the look the logans are unsurpassed,but sonically no match.
PS.another alternative are the INNERSOUND EROS.I owned a pair and the intergration and bass was superior to the
logans,plus they are 98db efficient.
Again this is just my opinion.Hope it helps.
hasse
230 posts
 
I have owned both the SL-3´s and the reQuests prior to my
current Maggie 3.6´s. You should definitely listen to both
brands before you buy. Good luck!
More to discover