Martin Logan SL3 vs Ascents

Hello,

There was a thread about this at martinloganowners.com, forum section. Check it out and decide for yourself.
I believe if you are "oldschool" you will claim that the SL3 sounds better. But if you are young like me, then there is no way that the SL3 is better than the Ascents.
It is just basic logic. A company that wants to move forward will not make a model who is inferior (Ascents replaces the SL3)than what it wants to replace.

Anyway, go to the website's archives(http://martinloganowners.com/forum/archives.html) and check the discussion out.

hope this helps

Generally the SL3s are better, esp. for the money. Amandarae's premise is flawed. There's numerous examples of companies (including martin logan) where the replacement does not equal the previous generations of gear. Anything recent by marantz, mcintosh qualifies as far as amps, and sony has yet to better the SCD-1.

-Ed

Sorry Ed, I respectfully disagree! The SL3s are certainly not better in terms of performance - the Ascents better them in just about every way, especially in the low mids and downwards.

I've got nothing against SL3s - you're correct in that they can be had relatively inexpensively and can be a dandy bargain, but head to head the SL3 is no match for the Ascent.