ATC, the big boys


Is there a reason why nobody uses the big ATCs in their home? The scm200s and scm300s are the speakers that are most commonly used in the studios. Why does everyone talk about the 100s and down? Are the 200scm and 300scm just not worth $40,000 or are they just too ugly? I would like to see what others think about the big ATCs. Thank to those who respond.
souljasmooth
The Active 200's and 300's were specifically designed for recording studios for the "rock and rollers". Turns out that they were blowing the tweeters out of the 150's and 100's and designed them to be "unbreakable" under any painful hearing level...

Furthermore, ATC speakers are designed to be purchased based on the room size that they are filling. If you provide your room size, they'll tell you the speaker size that you need. For most homes, the ATC 100's are the dream speaker. If you live in an warehouse loft with 5000 sf and 16' ceiling, go with the 150's or higher. If you want to most amazing imaging and speaker that disappears for an apartment room, go with the ATC active 20's.

I have 5 ATC active 100's, 2 01/15 ATC Subs and I have reached stereo/home theater nirvana. I never need to buy another speaker or sub again, unless they're stolen, burned or ravaged by war...
thanks for the info. Would a pair of 200 or 300's be just too much for most rooms? What about for the people with the big bucks? Is it worth it?
i can't imagine anything more than 100's. the 200/300's are ludicrous. soix nailed it by saying it's like putting bigger tires on a humvee.

if *really* deep bass is a priority, i'd get an ATC sub w/ a pair of active 50's or 100's.

the 50's roll off at about 40hz. i'm not sure about the 100's.