Alon IVs versus Vandersteen 2CE signatures


Hi folks,
I would love some input on this decision - I am trying to decide between a used pair of alon IVs and a new pair of Vandy 2ce Signatures. I am unable to hear the Alon IVs as they are in another state, but have previously heard, and enjoyed, the 1st gen Alon IIs. My initial impression of the Vandys were that they were vary laid back and smooth (something I like) but had very little "impact", particularly in the bass. The bass was clear and extended, it just did not pack much punch.

My listening tastes are musically split between female vocals (Charlotte Church, Jewel, Jennifer Warnes, etc.)and pop/hip-hop (Nelly, Crystal Method, etc.). In my one listening tests with the Vandys, they were wonderful on the first, but dissapointing on the second. Not sure if the room was the culprit, or if a sub would help add a little oomph.

Any and all input, experiences, or advice would be appreciated.

-Phillip
itr_hybrid
The Alon IV's are a great speaker but becareful of room size. They will put out a fair amount of low end. I have driven the with VAC Tube gear and Classe both with favorable results. Tubes smooth through the mid range and tweeter but the Classe really took hold of the bass. Great sound stage deep and wide.
Sometimes the tweeter can get a little zippy.

Good Luck.
Swklein, I am suprised by your assesment of the 2ce Sig's inability to reproduce percussive sounds, I looked at your system and can't find fault anything. I don't know the sound of your CD player or your cartridge. Do you feel that this is the case with both of your TT and CD player? Speakers are dumb as dirt and just reproduce what they are fed.

Yes,Phillip the addition of a Vandersteen 2wq is great but takes some work to set up. The room is always a big factor and it has taken me three years to get my speakers in just the right spot. Changes of 1/2" make a big difference.
If I only listened to chamber music and the like, Vandys would be my choice. You're correct, though, they ARE very laid back and dynamically constrained. Of course, this is all in the ear of the listener. Maxgain is certainly correct when he says that fine tuning can make all the difference.

Good luck and happy landings! Let us know what you decide.

will
It's too bad you can't go listen to the Alons. It's always a very good idea to listen to the speaker before purchase for obvious reasons. You really can't get a feel for anything from these threads. One mans cup of tea is another mans poison.
I owned a pair of 2ce sigs for a while and in my room with my electronics, they were as dynamic as anything I'd had up to that point. I have since moved up the Vandy line. Subs will make an improvement to the overall dynamics and bass impact but, as Maxgain says, require a lot of set up. Two of the 2wq's is better than one but placing a single 2wq between the 2's on the back wall works well.
It has been interesting to me how everyone says the Vandy's are laid back, not dynamic or what have you. I have used alot of speakers over 35+ years and I just can't agree with that. Maybe I've been lucky with setup or room but I have found Vandersteen's to be a very rewarding speaker.
Friends have always commented on how natural, transparent and dynamic(of all things) my current system is(3a Sigs and 2Wq's.) But, it may be as I said above, I have a room that suits them.
They do require a LOT of attention to set up and electronics makes a big difference in the end result.
Well, since you don't mind used, consider a pair of Vandersteen 3A used for about the same price or Model 3 and pocket the change. Better have a mighty amp for the original model 3 as it was a tough load to drive. Sound is similar to the 2Ce, but everything is better, especially in the low end.