Thiel 2.4 VS 3.6


I cannot decide between the Thiel 2.4 and 3.6 and welcome opinions and suggestions. I currently own a pair of Martin Logan Odysseys which I love BUT they do not work well in my new room environment in my new home. I listened to the Thiel 2.4's at CES and though they are not planar speakers they had that "electrostatic fast reacting type sound". Do the 3.6's have that same 2.4 type sound with a more robust low end or is the 3.6 a compromise due to it's older technology? Any comments or experiences are welcomed and appreciated. I currently own a Mark Levinson No. 331 or a Theta Dreadnaught II to drive them with.

I have a decent sized listening room but is has some challenges. My AV nook forces me to place my left main speaker within 6 inches of the left side wall and my right main speaker has to sit between the right side of my nook and my fireplace (basically in the middle of the room 7 feet from the left main speaker) The room is about 20 feet wide and 25 feet deep (with my dining room sharing the same space)
128x128Ag insider logo xs@2xsodapop
Thiel may or may not have 'left alone' the 3.6 for so long because they 'got it right' in the beginning. Personally, I suspect it is mostly because they were too busy addressing (successfully) the evolving demands of the HT segment and bringing out new flagship and entry-level products. Not that there's anything 'wrong' with the 3.6 that 'needed upgrading' either, but remember that Thiel, for all their influence and longevity, is still a pretty small company for the level of volume at which they operate and the number of products they offer. I just think there was a limit to how much they could do all at the same time. I also suspect that a potential engineering-vs.-marketing sticking point has more to do with the price range a new 3-series would have to occupy - as opposed to simply the challenge of achieving substantial enough improvement to justify a new model - and whether a new 3.7 would effectively kill the CS6.

Anyway, production of new 3.6's has for all practical purposes ground to a virtual halt nowadays. Thiel is no longer continuing to buy the Vifa drivers it uses due to very large price increases - presumably ones dictated by ever-smaller demand, and as models that once shared its tweeter were replaced in the lineup. Plus there are plenty of 3.6's available on the second-hand market. I think we can assume that the next 3-series will incorporate some kind of coincident driver array, since it is the only remaining Thiel not to do so (aside from the small 1.6, a near-full-range 2-way which does not as easily lend itself to such a design approach). Bringing this speaker out ASAP would seem like a no-brainer, since it likely stands to become their fastest seller ever. But I guess a lower-priced subwoofer and maybe a new 'statement'-level flagship model could still be competing for R&D time, though this is just speculation on my part, based mostly on reports of the options they were considering pursuing back before the latest round of new model introductions had taken place...
I just had an opportunity to audition my 3.6's with both a Theta Intrepid and Theta Enterprise monoblocks. Unfortunately, they didn't have a Dreadnaught II for me to compare to, but both Theta amps sounded great with the 3.6's. The Enterprises made my 3.6's do things that I never heard them do. The degree of instrument separation, depth and width of soundstage, and overall detail was incredible. And the "little" Intrepid really amazed me as well. I cannot fathom how a 5-channel, 100 watt amp could make the 3.6's sound so good. Sure, it didn't have the detail, control, or polish of the much costlier Enterprise monos, but it certainly captured the "Theta sound" and seemed to drive them just fine, even at somewhat higher volumes. I think that Theta amps match up very well with Thiel, so as mentioned, you should be good to go amp-wise with either a pair of 2.4's or 3.6's.

Tom.