Wharfedale Emerald 97 - compare to?

Yeap I would avoid them at all cost!!!
I have a friend who sells and trades alot of gear.I get to bring some of this stuff home a play with it before it is sold.He had several pairs of new Wharfedales. We set up a pair at my house...I kid you not those were probably the worst monitors I have ever heard! In the dictionary under boxey these speakers should be listed as a reference! Him and I sat there and laughed ...I could hardly concentrate on listening to them.

Also had a small pair of Monitor Audio B2s here the same day to play with... absolutely no comparison. The little B2s disappeared and I could detect hardly a hint of boxey colouration. You can do a lot better!

yeah, the wharfes were pretty boxy sounding.

Thanks to all who replied! I believe I'll pass on them then. I guess the old saying still holds true, "if it sounds to good to be true, probably is..."
Thanks again

I have a pair - many people do not realize that there are 2 versions w. different drivers, 1 in vinyl for cheap U.S. distribution on ubid.com, et. al.and 1 in real wood veneer (MK II) for general distribution (Amazon used to carry these). Made in China (but dont let that scare you off).
The vinyl version is crap as the woofer does not assilmilate well with midrange or tweeter. On the other hand, the MK II version may be the best deal in home audio. It is definately a "colored" speaker in that it infuses a warmth to most recordings (which also makes it very forgiving with less than steller recordings). Very easy to drive, good for HT applications (shielded), nice "high" soundstage and fairly handsome to boot. Compares favorably to my Opera Super Pavarottis ($1800 USD) and Martin Logan Arius ($2000 USD). Buy them if you can find them. Beware con artists selling inferior MKI version. Don't listen to my fellow audiophile snobs, unless you get the upgrade bug, possibly the last pair of speakers you will ever want or need.

I wonder how many reviewers actually listened to Emerald range of the Wharfedales before condemning them to the scrap heap?  I enjoy my 99's, 97's, 95's and 91's in the various systems I have scattered about my Ellenville, NY home.  While it is true that the 99's need a little help in the lowest bass regions for certain recordings my Wharfedale Sub-woofer takes care of that nicely, when needed.  I didn't bother with subs for the other systems.  Usually, the 99's do well enough by themselves.  I have had numerous comments from several "audiophiles" that they compare favorably with much more expensive systems and the musicality, openness, soundstage and clarity are undeniable.  I have spent hours listening to speaker systems costing tens of thousands and powered by huge amps, preamps and the like, but my Onkyo receiver (and vintage silver pioneer receivers) seem to do the job.  I did run the 99's through a vintage luxman 400t cube for a few weeks before selling it and the soundstage was incredible. I have driven them to maximum volume without any noticeable distortion.  They are smooth.  My 99's and 97's are black, real wood veneer, nicely finished with plinths and spikes. My 95's are real maple veneer with plinths and my 93's are real rosewood veneer.  I also have a few Anniversary 7.2s in black and rosewood (all real wood veneers) and for their size and price they are incredible.  For those who can't afford or simply won't spend thousands on speakers, these Wharfedales are amazing.