Question for Dunlavy ScIII users

Mike, you asked about the room. My room in the basement is 16' x 23' with a 7' ceiling. I've had the system on both the long and short wall. The short wall worked better because I have the speakers 4'-5' out into the room, and along the short wall allowed me to sit 8'-10' away. The long wall create a near field monitoring situation that doesn't really even work with the B&W's since I like rock at realistic (emotional) levels.

Ive owned 4 different amps with my dunlavys. Started with a B&K to an Acurus to a Krell and finally to Pass Labs. What Ive found is that the Dunlavys, while fairly easy to drive, are also ruthlessly revealing, especially in the higher frequencies. The cheaper amps and the krell had no problems driving the woofers but the highs were very often harsh and grainy. The Pass took care of that and improved the detail in spades. I run my 4a's with the Pass x-350. Its probably overkill but the looks are great and I like the zero feedback design. Speakers are 12' apart against the long wall and I sit about 10' back

thanks for all the input - mike

Mike, I don't know what you settled with on the amp question but thought I would throw my two cents worth. I have the SC-III's with the Dunlavy DAL cables coming out of a NAD C-370 and they sound fantastic. I have the Sony DVP-S9000-ES SACD/DVD, along with a VPI TT, old cassette deck and reel to reel. The NAD C-370 has impressed many of my friends with much higher quality and priced systems, which also speaks well of the Dunlavy's. My room is 30' by 16' with the speakers about 15' apart and my sweet spot is about 13'from the III's. Sit back and enjoy the music, I know that I am.