Funny, you never see any TacT reps hanging around these forums like Mr.Rives.
Rives PARC or Tact 2.0 AA for room correction?
Hi
I am looking for an analog room correction system and am looking at a used Rives PARC parametric EQ and Tact RCS 2.0 AA (with analog boards included) which were offered to me at similar prices.
I am quite happy running a pair of XLR interconnects straight from my CD player to my Preamp and have no intention of adding any DACs to my system.
However the advantage of getting the TACT is its versatility. I also suspect that it may be easier to set up.
Would the analog connections offered by the TACT be comparable to the Rives in terms of sound quality?
As I have no ability to trial both systems in my home, any advice is much appreciated.
I am looking for an analog room correction system and am looking at a used Rives PARC parametric EQ and Tact RCS 2.0 AA (with analog boards included) which were offered to me at similar prices.
I am quite happy running a pair of XLR interconnects straight from my CD player to my Preamp and have no intention of adding any DACs to my system.
However the advantage of getting the TACT is its versatility. I also suspect that it may be easier to set up.
Would the analog connections offered by the TACT be comparable to the Rives in terms of sound quality?
As I have no ability to trial both systems in my home, any advice is much appreciated.
- ...
- 18 posts total
I don't disagree with Mprime's comments, but it makes more sense to me to just go digitally from the CD player to the Tact. The different (if any) between the D/A stages is probably less than the ill effect (even if small) of the added A/D/A stages. Tact maintains a well run user group on Yahoo. Here's the link. Not everyone markets via Audiogon. |
- 18 posts total