Speakers, confusion, any ideas?

Yo Cine, thanks for the reponses. I read some of your answers/threads 2.3 v 2.4 pretty compelling. I would have to give your comments a lot of weight. Just for the record, the meniscus boys didnt say I needed to replace the tweets, "i did". One of my baby audiofiles thot the fine wires coming from the tweets needed to be pulled out. I soldered the connection back, but, it always seemed a little off after that. I am also glad to hear from you that a crossover is determined by driver characterics. I changed the drivers so the crossover needs to be optimized, it just makes sense. I know it all boils down to what *I* hear, ie, if it sounds good to me, but its good to know that an objective person indicates that i could be modifying to an audiophile level and NOT just barking up the wrong tree. I will probably continue on my mod/refurbish path with the epicures. One day, I will hopefully get a chance to play some of my reference music ( a lot of acoustic stuff...how can anyone use electronic or distorted rock an roll to determine speaker quality? after all hifi refers to the ability to reproduce the source, how do you know "what" that kind of music is supposed to sound like in the first place (another thread for sure) on a set of 2.4's just to either prove to my self, i have "done good" or produce that sick "system lacking" feeling. Oh by the way...with a full range speaker such as the 2.4 (down to 25 to 40 hz) do you recommend a sub?

"how can anyone use electronic or distorted rock an roll to determine speaker quality? after all hifi refers to the ability to reproduce the source, how do you know "what" that kind of music is supposed to sound like in the first place"

True but those kind of recordings can put stress on the system such that speakers are stressed and make their own noises. So you cannot use them for absolute accuracy, they can be used to stress the system and test systems in extreme frequencies normal instruments cannot reach.

The key to "knowing" about speakers is experience. Listen to all you can and do not be in awe but always be evaluating what is happening. Select a limited amount of recordings that you enjoy that have unique attributes that seem to vary from speaker to speaker. This takes time.

Building and measuring your own speakers is a way to become very good at recognizing flaws and how measurements and system performance correlate. making bad sounding speakers is very educational...I speak from a great deal experience.

Subwoofer if you feel you're missing bass. A speaker like the 2.4 for example may have an extended frequency response but at its lowest frequencies can be limited in its output. So getting a boost from a subwoofer can be helpful.

Obvious experience and apparently credentialed Cine, I would be interested in knowing what your own. Also how about a top five sounding CD recommendation?

Here are 5 CD's that have a great deal of good music and an eclectic selection of music. Not all tracks are perfect but the range from outstanding to just listenable can help define how fragile or how flexible your system is.

Until the End of the World Soundtrack
Sopranos Sound Track (Original)
The Soul of a Man by Wim Wenders (PBS series The Blues)
City of Angels Soundtrack
Into the Labrynth Dead Can Dance

These are some tracks I use to evaluate systems, notice how old some of the CD's are!

Enya Watermark track 3 "On your shore"
Crash test Dummies God Shuffled His feet track 10 "The Psychic"

Peter Gabriel So Track 6 "Mercy Street"
Megadeth Countdown to Extinction Track 1 "Skin O' my Teeth"
Depeche Mode Violator track 6 "Waiting for the night to Fall"

All of the tracks above accentuate areas that many speakers seem to have difficulty reproducing.

Almost all of my other "test" Cd's are limited "demo" cd's and cd's from Cd Classical magazine. None of my Classical test CD's are available for resale.

First of all, if you aren't using vinyl when doing these "demos", you aren't really hearing the music.

Second....ok, there really is no second. That's it.

Oz