Tube in Preamp or Power amp?

I think the below which I found in an amazon review on a tube integrated sold there says it all:

"After going through quite a few solid state and a few tube amps, I can't help but think of the wife mistress analogy.
Solid state amp is like a wife who is faithful, reliable, low maintenance, complex, intelligent, multi tasking but cold in bed.
Tube amp on the other hand is like a mistress who is not very reliable, high maintenance, too much fuss, simple but hot in bed."

SAy no more....

...I'll take the "hybrid". :^)

I use and measure at a totally different way than they use it. I think and work from a highend perspective. This means instruments and voices need to have the right proportion and the right sound. It is a very big accidence that it came to my path. I was surprissed that a brand like Onkyp can give a deep and wide stage. Because all there competitors are 2-dimensional. I tested them in the past for this. I was also surprised that with a Audyssey pro measurement I could get the sound realims of highend pre amps. When I bought a Onkyo receiver in 2010, I just bought it for a second set for fun and surround. In the last 11 year before this I had many highend sets just for stereo. I did many tests with Audyssey. When I measured at there way. The results were ok. So I changed the hights and the places. After some time I reallised that I can get a superior level in sound realims, drive, focus, depth and wide out of it. The acoustic part is only 1/3 of the whole Audyssey system. The other parts give me the freedom to get more dynamics and resolution. What I did at the show ( where I was the absolute sound) was letting people hear the difference between the acoustic part on and off. But also the other systems which give me more dynamics and resolution. Also these I can set on and off. So every person could hear what all the different parts did. I like things to be clear. When I visit clients I can blow every preamp till 10.000 euro away. This is what I do all the time in the last year. We compare clients there old pre amp with mine with Audyssey pro. I never had a tool which was this superior to any other preamp even at high prices. We will make an advertisement and we invite every person with his own pre amp and power amp to compare. Because I love comparison in audio the most. Listening to your music without acoustic limitations sets you free of all the acoustic problems. And it will let you hear more information and with much more precision. But also in the lowest freq. you will hear more different layers. I've spoken with a few brands which I use at shows to give a demo in the US as well. This is the only way that I can show my words are as I wrote them. I will inform every one here at Audiogon when I get this chanche.

Look what a good digital remastering does for a lot of old tv shows and movies. Why not expect similar results applying digital correction software intelligently to audio as well, if/when needed? God bless remastered CDs! Unless one likes to have various forms of dullness, fuzz and haze intrude on their listening. Why not use it to fix room acoustics, which are almost always sub-optimal otherwise, as well? Its on my list of things to try someday when time and expenses permit. It makes too much sense to just ignore. I know there are at last a handful of participants in these parts these days whose opinions I regard highly that swear by it.

Wenn Bo don't know, knowbody nose.
What Bo doesn't know is that he doesn't no.

With props to my friend wolf-e.

I have no beef with "room correction" per se, as long as it's not in MY system since I like the sound of my room...plus I have a "less is more" attitude with carefully applied (and carefully adjusted from time to time) REL sub levels, and prefer there be no extra cables, processors, language challenged self important Dutch Onkyo salesmen, nasty schoolgirls, or repo men between my preamp and amp. I can only assume the world is full of tawdry "sub-optimal" rooms begging for third party digital intervention!