Your most disappointing purchase or audition?

Tyler Acoustics Taylo 7U. I have owned one other pair of Tyler speakers and heard 7 or 8 others and found them to be at least very good, with several better than that. The 7U was dismal. Dull, flat, and not involving in the least. I liked this speaker less than any other I have ever owned.

Trelja,
From a philosophical standpoint I agree with much of what you wrote in your post. I owned a speaker with a series crossover(Harmonic Precision Echelon, 12 ohm load) and it was very good. For what ever reason the AZ Crescendo impressed me and was natural in sound (a must have for me).I do find that many modern "high resolution" speakers have a somewhat artificial character that strikes me as hifi rather than natural music reproduction. I definitely relate to your perspective in general.

Jwm, I've said all I'm going to say about Magico, to each their own.
Charles,

"My most disappointing purchase or audition?"

First wife 8^( Should have stuck with the audition... and passed on the purchase.

It seems that the issues that Tubes108 is talking about did not occur. I say that because I've not heard of this event and this company is too small for something like this to slip by me.

I take issues with a number of comments in the post- for example the preamps don't 'blow tubes'! We use a custom wire for internal hookup- so there would not have been one amp built with stranded wire and the other built with solid core. They would have both been solid core- we don't even stock a stranded hookup wire. Further, his comments about changing resistors to save time and 'Some directional components within the preamp were installed backwards', seem just dead wrong to me- the preamp is not likely work with electrolytic caps installed backwards(!) and certainly not with diodes either, on top of that we play each piece for 3 days to a week prior to shipping.

It does not surprise me that a power tube could have arced in one of our amps. We have seen tube failures (arc-over being the main failure mode) for 38 years. The amps are built to survive such events- its nothing new. We warrant the tubes for a year and its most likely that we will see failure of tubes immediately after shipping, depending to some degree on the shipping itself. But especially with the MkIII models (introduced 10 years ago) and newer, we have yet to see a tube failure damage the amp. However if Tubes108 was inside the product changing resistors to different values as he says, it is possible that this caused some of the damage he describes.

Right now I am feeling very much like this was some sort of drive-by potshot as neither I nor any of my staff can recall such an event. We are human of course, so we have a warranty to take care of the fact that we are not perfect, and our gear is entirely hand-wired, so there is certainly a human element. So I concede that we don't have a perfect record of shipment without failure or screwup on our part- that comes with the territory! But what I am seeing described is failures in all three products sent to one customer, in particular that details presented are not only unlikely but some of them are flat outright impossible, so I take this post as some sort of trolling event where there is possibly an underlying agenda.

Ralph, your well established credibility on this forum and in the industry as a whole leads me to agree with your assessment of this alleged situation. It sounded like a very unlikely scenario from the beginning.