I auditioned the MX120 a couple of years ago when I was setting up my rig, and I found it weak in 2 channel mode. Not entirely sure if that was also an artifact of the source, but it definitely didn't work for me. I'm a vinyl head, and the lack of integrated MC step-up input also was a nonstarter.
Because HT was very much a secondary consideration for my application, I ultimately went with a C50 for stereo and a MAC 3 pre/pro for 5.1. I was and remain very satisfied after 2 years of living with it and saved a bundle of money over the McIntosh one box solutions (currently MX121 and MX151).
So, I'd agree with most of the other respondents that separate stereo and HT preamps is the way to go. Personally, I'm a Mc fan, but Cary and Classe also auditioned well. I did not care for the Krell rigs, but that was just me. Auditioning what you can could make a big difference for you - it sure did for me.
Good luck & happy listening!
Because HT was very much a secondary consideration for my application, I ultimately went with a C50 for stereo and a MAC 3 pre/pro for 5.1. I was and remain very satisfied after 2 years of living with it and saved a bundle of money over the McIntosh one box solutions (currently MX121 and MX151).
So, I'd agree with most of the other respondents that separate stereo and HT preamps is the way to go. Personally, I'm a Mc fan, but Cary and Classe also auditioned well. I did not care for the Krell rigs, but that was just me. Auditioning what you can could make a big difference for you - it sure did for me.
Good luck & happy listening!