Summing up L & R line-level for dual subs

Based on that info I suspect that you would be marginally ok with respect to the effects I described.

Item 8 on this page appears to be applicable to the A370PEQ, and indicates an input impedance of 30K. The parallel combination of two 30K impedances and an 86K low frequency input impedance is 12.8K. That is not ideal in relation to the 3.3K output impedance of the preamp at 20 Hz (ideally you would want the combined load impedance to be 3.3 x 10 = 33K or more), but the result would be a rolloff of significantly less than 2 db at 20 Hz, and probably less than 1 db. There would also be some small phase shift effects. I suspect that neither of those effects would be great enough to be objectionable when you finish tweaking the sub adjustments.

I couldn't find capacitance numbers for the Neotech cabling, but I did find some anecdotal indications that it is on the low side. Between that and looking at diagrams of its construction I think it would be safe to assume that its capacitance is less than 50 pf/foot, which would mean that the total capacitance of the three cables is less than around (17 + 10 + 4) x 50 = 1550 pf. That represents a capacitive reactance (impedance) of about 5.1K at 20 kHz, which is reasonably high in relation to the 245 ohm output impedance of the preamp at high frequencies.

There is always, of course, the possibility that noise or hum problems can arise when long unbalanced cables are used, but that can't be predicted.

Also, fyi, member Bifwynne has mentioned in past threads that a gentleman named Tom Tutay, I believe of Transition Audio Design in Florida, has custom made for him at a reasonable price a combination mixer/buffer for addressing this kind of situation. It presents the preamp outputs with a high impedance, sums the two channels together, and provides a low output impedance.

Regards,
-- Al

Al,

Thanks so much for such a thoughtful post, and taking the time to do the research and the math. Truly appreciated! I'll have to digest it.

I have posted a question to Lamm to check if the outputs are buffered. Assuming they aren't, then it seems I could try 2 Y-connectors in series so to have L&R output > summed-up to one cable > divided into two RCA prongs using one to each sub. At least I could try it.

Thanks also for the tip about Transition Audio. I'm overseas, though, so that would be a second step.

I solve the issue of driving subs from stereo preouts by using an inexpensive 2-way pro electronic crossover (ART Pro Audio, Peavey, Behringer) with separate mono subwoofer output. A single sub can be driven from the crossover mono output or two subs can be driven from the stereo low outputs.

You're welcome, Lewinski. I think that in your last post, though, you may have misworded something:

I have posted a question to Lamm to check if the outputs are buffered. Assuming they aren't, then it seems I could try 2 Y-connectors in series so to have L&R output > summed-up to one cable > divided into two RCA prongs using one to each sub. At least I could try it.

Didn't you mean to say "are" instead of "aren't"? Otherwise you would be summing to mono the signals that are ultimately provided to the main speakers, as was said earlier.

Also, it seems to me that a connection arrangement in which summing is done by the subs, and not with y-adapters, would be consistent with the approach recommended by Mr. Geddes. Presumably what he is recommending is simply having both subs reproducing a mono signal (with the subs having different settings, as you indicated), irrespective of how that mono signal is derived. I see no reason for the means by which the mono signal is obtained to be relevant to what his recommendations are intended to accomplish, as long as the chosen means will function properly.

Regards,
-- Al

Gbart,

Thanks for the suggestion. I will look into those (especially if the Lamm outs are NOT buffered).

Cheers