Hello All,
I think that we all can agree that adequate break in is essential for proper analysis of any audio or video component. Many great pieces of gear require a long break in period before they give you even a hint of what to expect. It is irresponsible fo a reviewer to make any bold comments before the piece was fully broken in.
Responsible journalism begins with the understanding that certain products require adequate break in before they reach their true potential. Some reviewers may not know any better ... perhaps because they haven't the first hand exposure or maybe they have a core belief that every component should only require a little amount of time to fully break in.
Regardless, the reviewer should inquire what the normal break in period is and other pertainent info, such as the DC compensation, in this case.
It should be the reviewer's goal to do whatever possible to make the reviewed piece sound optimal ... this should include proper isolation, cabling, etc.
This speaks volumes about the reviewer in question and hopefully not about the magazine as a whole.
Respectfully,
Jack Seaton