Nuforce

Obviously the Nuforce are not for everyone,some did
like them,some did not.In my case I happen to like them,
Jason I dont know you, I think you have something
special on this amp,one person I know He heard them
on the show, and did not like them,what kind a evaluation,
is that? In order to know if the amp are good, you
should hook them in your system,some are only interested
comparing them with their expensive amps,I know already
this amps are not as good as the CJ350, and the DNA500,
driving the Andra II,but at the end I respect everybody's
opinion.We are all created unique.

I know already this amps are not as good as the CJ350, and the DNA500, driving the Andra II

Jayctoy, thanks for your kind comment. But he he he he, I think the above statement should include a certain version and model of the amp :). In a few more weeks, we'll have some announcement to make and everyone will know our product roadmap. Every product that we introduced are carefully positioned in a grand scheme ;).

Jason from NuForce

Jason the CJ350, is a Conrad Johnson 350, and the
DNA500 is the McCormack.

I think he meant a certain model of his amp.

I'm pretty sure that one of the things that really muddies the issue is that people get used to whatever sound they've had, and when they try a demo unit at home IT ISN'T what they are used to hearing. I am going through that right now. Different may or may not be better, but it is different and you have to allow for that.

Example: compared to my reference tube amp, the NuForce Reference 9s have a much more dynamic sound. Is it better? My experience has been affected by the bloom of tubes. I have to refresh my thinking in terms of dynamics, soundstaging, clarity, bloom/compression, bass and treble extension. The change isn't a familiar sound (yet) since I am so used to the tube effect. BOTH are, to my ear, excellent. But different.

Bob Wood

http://www.GreatHomeTheater.com
http://www.woodsgoods2.blogspot.com