Nuforce

I am finding out that the Ref9 9.01 is more like
analog sounding,and I am able to play all my bright
sounding cd,plus the musicality got better.The decays
of the intruments are with extension and air.Its much
quicker now, maybe the dealer is right that it needs more,
burn in,now I have to try my Plinius again,to confirm
what Iam hearing,remember my SA100 it has tube sounding
quality.I am having fun listening with the NF.

Ar_t, thanks for your candid contribution. Perhaps we will all need to add a bit more salt to the forum recipe here on Audiogon. While I am completely in favor of manufacturers contributing here, Audiogon's refusal to flag those that obvioulsy MAY have a different agenda than the typical hobyist compromises the very integrity of this forum. Buyer beware!

Ar t, thats why we have to audition first, before
making a decision,here at Agon you can get a good
feel about the gear you want to buy,You see? I like
the Nuforce Ref9 9.01, it does not mean it will
work for everyone.This is only simple common sense,
My experience tells me, I should not listen all
the time for what I read here, but I use them for
reference.Anyone who will recommend and for the wrong
motives thats not acceptable of course, thats why
we have to be careful, ask more members to confirm
it.They are many knowledgeable member here, who can
really help.

My review of the NuForce Reference 9 is now on my site toward the bottom of this page:

http://www.GreatHomeTheater.com/studio.html

I don't know why they lumped us all together.

Nor do I have any idea what those new programs are. It has been over 1 month since they announced the change, but no details have come forward.

OK.......question for the gang:
Should small, "unknown" manufacturers (like us, for example) put in BIG letters on every post that we are manufacturers??? Personally, I am not in favor of that. There are guys who make numerous mindless posts (on other forums) just to get their name and URL in front of as many eyes as possible. But if that alleviates confusion, then perhaps we should here.

"I'm all ears."