Clever Little Clock - high-end audio insanity?

*Charlie, then what's your take on the one member in our club who correctly knew when the clock was in or out of the system?*

He guessed very well. In any group there is always one person who through gifted insight or dumb luck (much more likely) to guess (not predict as that is based on fact)more accurately than the rest. It's simply a matter of probability and statistics.
There is no proof, logic, or empirical data to support any evidence that this product works. The manufacturer has been dancing around an explanation for this and "silly pebbles" for a while now.

"on the hush hush".
OK I promise not to tell anybody if everybody else does too.
LOL

According to the Positive Feedback review the effects were so dramatic that it should be easy to carry out a succesful double blind test. Given how improbable this device is, I think the Clarks and Positive Feedback have an obligation to carry out this test to save their reputation. I'm trying to keep an open mind, but there seems to be a excuse to explain away every question.

I'm disappointed about what this says about high end audio in general - manufactures and reviewers are not to be trusted. Seems to me it hurts the industry and it discourages people from getting involved in the hobby.

Seems to me it hurts the industry and it discourages people from getting involved in the hobby.

How so? My take is that people hearing this fascinating phenomenon would be drawn to the subject of better sound reproduction.

Wellfed...how do you go about making type smaller like you did in you last post?