Clever Little Clock - high-end audio insanity?

According to the Positive Feedback review the effects were so dramatic that it should be easy to carry out a succesful double blind test. Given how improbable this device is, I think the Clarks and Positive Feedback have an obligation to carry out this test to save their reputation. I'm trying to keep an open mind, but there seems to be a excuse to explain away every question.

I'm disappointed about what this says about high end audio in general - manufactures and reviewers are not to be trusted. Seems to me it hurts the industry and it discourages people from getting involved in the hobby.

Seems to me it hurts the industry and it discourages people from getting involved in the hobby.

How so? My take is that people hearing this fascinating phenomenon would be drawn to the subject of better sound reproduction.

Line, to make the type smaller you must have the CLC. With two CLCs it will be even smaller. Letters always appear smaller from the perspective of the observer when there is a time dilation.