2. amps-preamps
  3. 1144510021

Pass Labs X-600 vs. X350.5 vs. SoundLabs?

I hate audio ... I really do ... Crack addicts pass me on the street and I call tell that they're thinking "at least I don't spend MY money on $2,000 power cords!" But I digress. ...

I recently sold my beloved M-L Prodigys and replaced them with a pair of SoundLab ProStats. We're talking 9ft x 4ft of radiating panels here people!

So far my wonderful Halo JC-1s have not even broken a sweat powering these monsters. But I've got a hankerin' to try a Pass Labs amp, only because my preamp and phono stage are Pass equiment.

Perhaps courtesy of the impending D-day of April 15th (isn't it the 17th this year?) there are a few Pass Labs X350.5's for sale for under $6K. Yet for the same price I can also buy a pair of X-600's (NOT 600.5's, of course).

So my questions for all those out there are these:
(1) Should I leave well enough alone and keep the wonderful JC-1's and spend the extra money or something frivolous like a medical checkup or car insurance?
(2) Should I be a true-blue audiophile and dump a great product that's served me well so that I can try something else? If yes, then what would be a better ... well ... I don't know .... "value" I guess? The pair of X-600's or an X-350.5?

To assist you in answering, I live in a condo so turning up my amps to "11" to hear "Smoke On The Water" is not an option. I don't need to have my filling fall out from the decibels. I listen at what most of us would consider "moderate" levels and my music of choice is small combo jazz, chamber and opera and alternative.

In terms of synergy, the system is as follows:

VPI TnT6/Triplanar VII/Dynavector XX-2 L.O
Esoteric DV-50S
Magnum Dynalab 108 Triode (a freakishy great tuner, BTW)

Pass Labs X0.2
Pass Labs XOno

Kimber KS-1130
Kimber KS-3033

So, X-600, X-350.5, stay with the JC-1s or ....?
veloceracing
avguygeorge
2,300 posts
 
I have had a passing interest in the x350.5 for a while, to drive my Wilsons, so thanks teejay for your input. I always knew this was thee place to come for comfort and guidence in prioritizing things audio, and how they interact with life's choices. Having sold my first-born I would know. (The buyer wants a refund.)
veloceracing OP
26 posts
 
Wow! Thanks to all of you for the quick, detailed and informative responses! Let me try to answer collectively: you are probably right that because of my music and environment I will not need th sheet grunt of the X-600's. I mean, if I decide to hold a week-long salute to organ music well ... yea, maybe I might need horsepower. The JC-1s with 400WPC have had no issues whatsoever powering the Prodigys and the SoundLabs. So the X350.5 should not either.

The only reason that I was considering the X-600's was because of the dreaded crosstalk issue: there's something appealing and logical about mono amps. On the negative side, though, one less amp means once less box that makes the stereo room look like a mad scientist's laboratory.

The advice to audition the amps is reasonable but, regrettably, I don't want to take advantage of my local dealer. I can't afford the new price tags of either component. I was just attracted by the fact that the X-600's and the X-350.5 are avaiable at roughly the same price of around $6,000.

But there is one thing that rubbed me the wrong way about the responses to my question: Jameswei is on record as stating "First, if you're happy with the JC-1s, I'd stay with them." What the hell????? What sort of audio talk is this? Are we sure that Jameswei is really one of us? Can someone do a background check on him? I would not be surprise if we discover that he is a paid lacky of the International Global Book Readers Consortium. That sort of reasonable talk has NO PLACE on Audiogon.

As a refreshing comparison, Teajay rightfully advised me to forgo that checkup to find out why I'm spitting blood and whether the numbness in my arm is anything serious. "Everthing else can wait!" he says. Now THAT'S sound (get it ... "sound"?) advice!
bpwalsh
1,207 posts
 
If your JC-1s aren't yet broken in, I suggest you haven't heard them. Play music through them around the clock. Volume level doesn't matter (just not zero), nor does high or low bias setting. They will become much more agile, dynamic, sweet, and extended. I recommend giving them the time they need, as deals on other amps will come along if you decide to change.

Others have expressed the .5 versions of the Pass amps are better, although I have not heard them side by side. The X600 is not an involving sounding amplifier, in my opinion.

It may be worth noting that performance measured by Stereophile (Feb. 2003 issue) of the JC-1 showed output far in excess of ratings, I think nearly 600 watts into 8 ohms before clipping and about 1100 watts into 4 ohms.
veloceracing OP
26 posts
 
Hello Essentialaudio: The JC-1s were purchased new on 02/05. On average they are used about 4 hours a day so they passed the 1,000 hr mark a while ago. Again, I want to be clear here: I think the JC-1 is a stellar product. I am not succeptible to the stigma some place on "low sticker" audio gear (as if $6,000 is a trifle sum). More expensive isn't always better. More expensive usually correlates with low production numbers, as far as I'm concerned. So it's not that the JC-1s are lacking in something and I am looking elsewhere for satisfaction. It's just that I want to try a Pass Labs amp. It's more of a whim issue. Thanks.
bpwalsh
1,207 posts
 
Veloceracing, at the risk of being dogmatic, I _strongly_ recommmend breaking in the amps 24/7 with music playing, not cycling the power. You've probably broken them in a good bit but perhaps not as effectively as running them around the clock (not just turned on - signal must be passing through them with speaker loads connected).

By the way, they respond well to better power cords, although the stock cords aren't too bad as stock ones go.
More to discover