Tube Characterization: 6DJ8, 6922, 7308, CCa, etc


Does anyone agree with me that there should be detailed descriptions of the sonic characteristics of each of the popular versions of each of the above tubes. I've read Joe's Tube Lore and a number of manufacturers web-sites which are great general direction guides but they really don't tell us what we need to know in specific and defined terms. Perhaps starting with an overall sonic characteristic like liquid, or warm, or dry or transparent then their response at the frequency extremes (since this is always an issue with tubes), then perhaps individual characteristis with say female voice, piano etc. and then imaging. We would all purchase a set of cheap base line tubes that are known for consistancy and have clearly defined caharacteristics so that comparisons could be made to this benchmark. Then use benchmark recordings. Even better if we had the same equipment best yet if we benchmarked every component in the chain but not necessary because we would be dealing in relatve values.

Of course there is the question of synergy with existing equipment and the fact that we all don't hear exactly the same and so on and so forth, but again, it would all be relative. "Tube "A" has has better defined bass than the benchmark by a factor of 3 on a scale of 1-10 IMO" for instance. Of course this wouldn't be an exact science but it would give us real direction and be more useful than "this is a really great tube or this is a really, really great tube" or slavishly depending on the opinion of the tube specialty store who may be as honest as the day is long but does have to move what he has in stock. If we can bring this evaluation process closer to science we could spend less time playing this silly expensive guessing games and spend more time exploring the kind of sound we like and buying the kind of sound we want (not to mention, listening to more music) Thoughts?
anacrusis
this question can only be answered in the context of a particular tube circuit.

it is difficult to generalize because circuits differ, even discounting the variable of differences in perception of sound.
I've found TFK 6DJ8s to be accurate, linear and true across the frequency range. Mullards are nice but a little warm to my ears in my system. It's not really what this tube sounds like versus that, it all depends, But if I were going to make generalizations, it would be just the opposite of your observations, just my 2ยข.

Happy listening,
Joe
You guys might want to check out issue 7 of Vaccum tube Valley (VTV). An analysis of about 26 different versions plus a history of the development with pictures of versions from different eras.

In VTV has done such test on a number of tube types. I don't necessarily agree with any of them but it is basically what this thread proposed.

BTW-I think this endeavor is fruitless. You can change the sound of tube by just changing the operating point (plate voltage, load ressistors, heater voltage,...). Also, the sound in different topologies(anode follower, cathode follower, cascade, mu follower, etc..) vary with the same tube.
Hey anacrusis, give up your quest for accurate infor on a specific model of tube characterists.
I've tried and have had little luck. You raise a very good question that everyone wants to wiggle out of.
I personally do not go cahsing after a "magical tube". Obviously I leave that decision up to the designer of the amp. If i get the amp and it fails to deliver what i need in my muisic, away she goes.
On the tech topic i asked what are the general characterists of the following tubes 6550, Kt88, KT90, EL34.
Received one good answer, Others were vague and elusive. not straightup.
You are right , by replacing a few tiny pre tubes, you may give up one slight characterist in one, for another. But almost always too subtle a change to notice.
I thought about rolling the 4 russian 6922's in my Cayin 17 cdp, but guess what, I'm not. The designer put them in and thats where they'll stay.
If i get a tube amp, and don't like the sound, i'm not going to "roll" the tubes to get better sound. To me thats nonsense.
Just dump the amp and get one you like better.
its that simple.
What a silly game "tube rolling".
My tube rolling experiences with many tubed-based components is polar opposite to the comments made by Bartokfan. What exactly are people trying to wiggle out of? Quantifying how each and every brand/model tube will sound in each and every component? Sorry, but as Albert already alluded to, it's just not that easy.

In some cases, the differences can be subtle. And in others not at all. There have been times where a single pair of tubes changed in a component resulted in greater refinements than I had achieved in past component upgrades that costed far more. If all you hear time and time again is a subtle change, that indicates the limitations of the component or system under evaluation and not the process of comparing tubes.

From what I have learned with trying various Mullards, Telefunkens, Brimars, etc., EL34, 12ax7 and 6922/6DJ8 tubes, I would never make final judgement on any component that contained Sovtek tubes. These things are mediocre at best. No master audio engineer can resolve this with fancy capacitors, point-to-point wiring, teflon boards, chassis dampening, 18 stages of regulation, etc.

As for what tubes the designer puts in a new product, obviously new off-the-shelf tubes are the only option due to availability and guarantee issues. But with very little effort, many of us hear components perform at levels even their designers never heard.

Bartokfan, you are free to keep the stock tubes in your preamp all you want. And this is good news to the rest of us as there is one less person to compete with when a good deal on older tubes becomes available. But do not condemn the efforts and experiences of others who have significantly different results than yours. And to claim it is nonsense clearly indicates you have a lot less experience with this process than a number of Audiogon members whose reports in these forums echo mine to a T. Afterall, you are into component rolling while the rest of us do it at the tube level.

What I find silly is to go through preamp after preamp, amp after amp, etc., the cost of shipping and potential for damage, until I find a stock unit that meets my goal. Sorry Bartokfan, but it is not that simple...it is naive. I'd rather purchase a few pairs of tubes that cost me $10 or $20 to ship, try them in my system, keep the ones I like and put the rest back on the used market. Now that's simple. It sure beats packing and shipping 50-100 lb components around the globe.

Through the sharing of tube-rolling knowledge by others with the same components as mine, I have taken my system to a performance level that I never knew possible with these components. Rather than put a negative spin on this and call it a silly game, I think of this as a continued quest for refined magic.