Can tube amps give true high end bass?


I got the giant Silverline Grande La Folia speakers. They are really good and true high end in my opinion. They are efficient ca 93Db but got for bass 4 x 9,5ยด dynaudio woofers in each cabinet. I have tried 2 tube amps with them: Antique Sound Labs monos 2x60w and a protype VERY good 2x40W with El34 tubes (more about that amp in a later tread). And I have tried 2 transistor amps: An Ayre V1xe and Krell 450mcx monos. All givin very good sound in the mids and heigths BUT very different in bass. In my opinion the best bass was from the tube amps. Powerful deep bass!!

My dealer clames that such big speakers need a lot of power to control the 8 woofers: You must have several 100W i.e. tranistor or BIG tube amps like big VTL. With the "small" tube amps, that you have tried, the woofers get out of control and "pumping" air in an incorrect way. This movement in the woofers gives sound on it own that you only THINK is good bass!

Beeing an audiophile for 30 years I think I can determine when I hear good bass. But I am puzzled! -How can a 40W tube amp give better bass that Krell 450 monos?
128x128ulf
Amfibius, Thank you very much for the explanation. I had ignored damping factor as a possible reason for this "resonance" because Jmaldonado talked about the amplifier rather than the amplifier/speaker interface. I realize that speaker impedance curves are (generally) not linear and for most speakers, will drop around the bass (except for my former ESLs) leading to the lowest DF at the lowest bass. I guess I automatically assume that people, especially those with low-power SETs, would seek appropriately matched speakers so they would get speakers with low DF requirements. My tube amps do quite well with my efficient and high impedance woofers, though my amps are "cursed" with very large OPTs and a surfeit of power and my speakers are designed to use low-power amps.

I wonder if that is the reason why we tube amp owners "miss" the lowest frequencies in the bass... I had thought that the main reason I was missing 12Hz was that my speakers reportedly only go down to 18Hz :^).

In any case, I would have thought that once one gets down to below 40Hz, it becomes much more an issue of the speaker's frequency curve than the amp's (if properly matched) and in the real world, anything below 60Hz and I expect that room loading/acoustics will make a mockery of the "flat frequency response curve" that an amp, tube or SS, produces.
The differencies are VERY noticeable even above 40 Hz.
I tried a system in my office:

1.PC as transport
2.Audio Note DAC 2.1 Signature
3.B&W 602 S3
4.Kimber VS8 speaker cable

Both with CAMBRIDGE AUDIO 640 V2 integrated SS amp,and with SET 300B MONOBLOCKS (2 x 9W).A/B testing for few hours.
Results - better than expected with every amp.BUT:

1. 300B monos had a better vocal,and treble and midrange alltogether.Which was expected,of course.
2. Bass - SS amp had more tight and more precise bass.Especially noticed in fast double-bass parts.More than depth,the bass SPEED was a problem for 300B.
Dynamic fast bass drum (double bass pedals) were significantly better with Cambridge amp.But these 300B monos
cuold be improved with better output transformer (which is the most important part for bass in SET amp).

This is why i plan to use SS monos on rear 12" woofer of my Silverline Sinfonia,as mentioned above in my post.Best of both worlds.
I think it's horses for courses. My choice for an amp if I was going to play Jimi Hendrix's Purple Haze would be SS. I'd want that woofer going out as far as it could and coming back and stopping when it should. I also have an original master of a jazz trio recorded with very expensive mikes and no compression. The bass sounds best with my SET. I hear much more detail which in that situation makes it better for me.