Jylee
The only concern is the soundstage imaging which is not as good as before.Jylee
This from experience may be because it does not use the far more expensive NSL32SR2S (S=sorted)+(tighter impedance span) "quad matched" as in the production Lightspeed Attenuator.
Rather it use the cheaper NSL23SR3 (non sorted)+(wilder impedance span) units and only "pair matched". And from experience even though the channel balance is fair, the i/o impedances vary quite quite a bit compared (because of the wilder impedance span)to the quad matched NSL32SR2S, and yes from listening to these the sound stage image does seem suffer at the different points of resistances.
Cheers George
The only concern is the soundstage imaging which is not as good as before.Jylee
This from experience may be because it does not use the far more expensive NSL32SR2S (S=sorted)+(tighter impedance span) "quad matched" as in the production Lightspeed Attenuator.
Rather it use the cheaper NSL23SR3 (non sorted)+(wilder impedance span) units and only "pair matched". And from experience even though the channel balance is fair, the i/o impedances vary quite quite a bit compared (because of the wilder impedance span)to the quad matched NSL32SR2S, and yes from listening to these the sound stage image does seem suffer at the different points of resistances.
Cheers George