Lightspeed Attenuator - Best Preamp Ever?


The question is a bit rhetorical. No preamp is the best ever, and much depends on system context. I am starting this thread beacuase there is a lot of info on this preamp in a Music First Audio Passive...thread, an Slagle AVC Modules...thread and wanted to be sure that information on this amazing product did not get lost in those threads.

I suspect that many folks may give this preamp a try at $450, direct from Australia, so I thought it would be good for current owners and future owners to have a place to describe their experience with this preamp.

It is a passive preamp that uses light LEDs, rather than mechanical contacts, to alter resistance and thereby attenuation of the source signal. It has been extremely hot in the DIY community, since the maker of this preamp provided gernerously provided information on how to make one. The trick is that while there are few parts, getting it done right, the matching of the parts is time consuming and tricky, and to boot, most of use would solder our fingers together if we tried. At $450, don't bother. It is cased in a small chassis that is fully shielded alloy, it gets it's RF sink earth via the interconnects. Vibration doesn't come into it as there is nothing to get vibrated as it's passive, even the active led's are immune as they are gas element, no filaments. The feet I attach are soft silicon/sorbethane compound anyway just in case.

This is not audio jewelry with bling, but solidly made and there is little room (if any) for audionervosa or tweaking.

So is this the best preamp ever? It might be if you have a single source (though you could use a switch box), your source is 2v or higher, your IC from pre-amp to amp is less than 2m to keep capaitance low, your amp is 5kohm input or higher (most any tube amp), and your amp is relatively sensitive (1v input sensitivity or lower v would be just right). In other words, within a passive friendly system (you do have to give this some thought), this is the finest passive preamp I have ever heard, and I have has many ranging form resistor-based to TVCs and AVCs.

In my system, with my equipment, I think it is the best I have heard passive or active, but I lean towards prefering preamp neutrality and transparency, without loosing musicality, dynamics, or the handling of low bass and highs.

If you own one, what are your impressions versus anything you have heard?

Is it the best ever? I suspect for some it may be, and to say that for a $450 product makes it stupidgood.
pubul57
One type of passive I have not tried are the EVS and Endler types. While I get the idea behind why the LSA without contacts would be beneficial, it also seems that EVS/Endler approach might have some theoretical advantage, no worries about IC capacitance, no IC, two less IC RCA connections and I think EVS uses a single Vishay nude in the signal path. Any experience with these? Head-to-head with LSA?
At one time I had the EVS and Endler attenuators. I preferred the EVS and still have them. They still use an Elma switch and I think it's a shunt to ground design. I might be wrong about that though. It does eliminate the extra set of interconnects but it doesn't sound better than the LSA.
Pubul57 - Uriah selll kits and finished products as per his website.

anyone tried his Lightspeed product and how it dffers from George's?
Unless I am missing something, it seems he builds the kit, but you are still required to do the install into a chassis - no? Can you tell me what changes, if any, he has done to the LSA recipe? It does look interesting, other then I am a klutz with any element of DIY.
Hi Paul, I can answer a few points for you.
1: Nobody as far as I know uses the NSL32SR2S "S" donates selected versions of the NSL32SR2 which are far more uniform and far more expensive.
2: As far as I know nobody does matched quad sets, as this is exponentially harder to do than matched pairs, matched quads gives far better min volume level, a better logarithmic feel when in use, and more stable i/o impedances.
3: All the NSL's need to be potted together for balance stability, this is not mentioned at all with the others.
4: Some of the others, especially the ones from Asia are using a fixed series resistor (instead of a NSL) with only one NSL shunted to ground, this was my first MkI version and though still better than any volume potentiomer (pot) was clearly bettered with the MkII version which was a quad matched sets, all my MkI's were recalled 5 years ago and converted to MkII's because they clearly sounded better.

Cheers George