new experience with my passive preamp

FWIW, Friends, I found that a balance control settles the
mind. Where some music is predominently heavy to one side,
it is comforting to be able to adjust/re-evaluate and
judge for myself what sounds best. Aging tubes, different
wire, new components may require a shift in control.
Not having that option is just silly! It may end up
tipping the scale between pre-amp purchases. Just like
to have or have not a remote. So I got it added. BG

According to very many passive linestage aficionados the Placette is the best.

But according to Placette their active unit is better than the passive.

Having owned both the Placette passive and active, I can verify both of Paul's points.

The reason the Placette Passive is hard to "characterize" is that It has no "character." That's the beauty of the piece: It's transparency(added and subtracting nothing/doing no harm). It just lets exactly what emanates from your source(good or bad) to pass to the rest of the system with ONLY a change in the volume. The one reason I sold mine was my bi-amped system couldn't play loud enough with some of the un-compressed recordings I love. I'm a realistic SPL freak. The Placette Active unit would probably have satisfied that hunger, but then I wouldn't have made the major paradigm shift that I did: jumping right from a life long straight-wire-with-gain/digital hating/don't-tamper-with-the-signal nut to a TacT RCS 2.2X lover. That didn't even have the gain that I needed until I upgraded the power supply. You're right Mr B: If there is any imbalance at all, anywhere in your system/room/tubes- It will greatly affect imaging, sound stage, etc. A balance control IS a very nice thing to have. Again, YES- The Placette is the Rolls-Royce of passive linestages.

And the Bent TAP the Bentley?