Lightspeed Attenuator - Best Preamp Ever?


The question is a bit rhetorical. No preamp is the best ever, and much depends on system context. I am starting this thread beacuase there is a lot of info on this preamp in a Music First Audio Passive...thread, an Slagle AVC Modules...thread and wanted to be sure that information on this amazing product did not get lost in those threads.

I suspect that many folks may give this preamp a try at $450, direct from Australia, so I thought it would be good for current owners and future owners to have a place to describe their experience with this preamp.

It is a passive preamp that uses light LEDs, rather than mechanical contacts, to alter resistance and thereby attenuation of the source signal. It has been extremely hot in the DIY community, since the maker of this preamp provided gernerously provided information on how to make one. The trick is that while there are few parts, getting it done right, the matching of the parts is time consuming and tricky, and to boot, most of use would solder our fingers together if we tried. At $450, don't bother. It is cased in a small chassis that is fully shielded alloy, it gets it's RF sink earth via the interconnects. Vibration doesn't come into it as there is nothing to get vibrated as it's passive, even the active led's are immune as they are gas element, no filaments. The feet I attach are soft silicon/sorbethane compound anyway just in case.

This is not audio jewelry with bling, but solidly made and there is little room (if any) for audionervosa or tweaking.

So is this the best preamp ever? It might be if you have a single source (though you could use a switch box), your source is 2v or higher, your IC from pre-amp to amp is less than 2m to keep capaitance low, your amp is 5kohm input or higher (most any tube amp), and your amp is relatively sensitive (1v input sensitivity or lower v would be just right). In other words, within a passive friendly system (you do have to give this some thought), this is the finest passive preamp I have ever heard, and I have has many ranging form resistor-based to TVCs and AVCs.

In my system, with my equipment, I think it is the best I have heard passive or active, but I lean towards prefering preamp neutrality and transparency, without loosing musicality, dynamics, or the handling of low bass and highs.

If you own one, what are your impressions versus anything you have heard?

Is it the best ever? I suspect for some it may be, and to say that for a $450 product makes it stupidgood.
pubul57
and he does show a lightspeed attenuator in his system.
here's the link: http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?vevol&1275577400
Thanks for the help Whart that could be him but still no way of contacting him.
Banquo363 "Minh" another Lightspeed owner in the U.S. emailed me and said he knows him and will try to get an email to him to either turn of the comcst.net blocking or to email me using another provider, I hate all this stuff.

Cheers George
Hey, thanks to George, Minh, and Whart for helping out here!!

George, I have a system on this site but I never made it private. So I guess you've read my email regarding the Lightspeed. If you don't wish to discuss it here, I can send Minh an email from another computer. It's a crappy way to communicate, but if it's all we can do privately, I guess it will have to do. Of course if you wish to discuss it on this thread that's ok with me. Just let me know in this thread what you want to do.

It's a shame about all the comcast.net emails that you are having a problem with. Must be something with the security.
Ah great it was driving me nuts, this is not the place to start discusing this, the moderators monitor me closely being a manufacturer.
Can you get to me with another email either by droping the spam filtering on the comcast account or by another internet provider, maybe at work or somewhere?
Cheers George
I don't get why the 'new' Audiogon prevents private messaging. I've heard it speculated that this will protect their fee structure, but it is easy enough to communicate offline via email. I have never screwed Audigon on a commission as a seller and won't- the system protects me, as it does the buyer. But, at the same time, there are many instances where it makes sense to have a private conversation- for example a user wants to follow up with another user about a product, or has a question for a manufacturer that isn't really intended to suggest that the product is defective, but might be interpreted that way. Right now, that can only be done through the mechanism of a product offering where a question can be posed and answered privately. But for other inquiries, not tied to a specific product listing, that still appears to be impossible. We see many times that a disgrundled user will take something public here - and often hurts the rep of the vendor or manufacturer- when more private communications can sort out the problem to both parties' satisfaction. Nor am i suggesting that someone that got burned on a deal- either side- doesn't take advantage of the protections of the system and the dispute process. That's sort of my point- private messaging won't undercut the system.
I'm not suggesting anything that anything between these posters is amiss here at all- that's sort of the point- I don't need to know. But, Audiogon currently makes such communications impossible. Have a little faith, Audiogon- if someone is going to duck their obligations to pay a commission- if that truly is the reason why private messaging was discontinued- they will do that anyway! The real community here is, with few exceptions, pretty scrupulous and that is what the good will of Audiogon is based on.
Best to all-