2. amps-preamps
  3. 1210578686

Help me make sense of this.

I have quad 405-II amp which is 100 watts per channel.
When I hooked up Yamaha RX-V3300 home theatre receiver, in stereo mode, wow I loved the sound !

Yamaha is 130 watts per channel. Does anyone know how much power I am getting in stereo mode?

Is Yamaha big current amp?

Does that mean I like powerful amps?

I didn't think surround receivers did music as well as a dedicated 2 channel amp ( especially seperates ) - so, I was pleasantly surprised at how music sounded through Yamaha - or has Yamaha improved their surround receivers to sound good in music as well ( in stereo )?

I want to know the answer, so that I might look for a more powerful amp in the future.

This question got me all excited, and I am puzzled...
Some one please shed some light on this - and I will appreciate that a lot.

It will influence the direction my next system will take.

gonglee3
rodman99999
6,185 posts
 
Your Quad is going on thirty years old. In it's day, it was a very good amp. Nowdays, it will have a hard time sounding as "musical" in comparison a lot of "mid-fi" gear. No doubt- you are hearing a lot of definition that you've been missing. There are a bunch of people that refuse to admit(or face the fact) that there have been a number of improvements with regard to the electronic components(passive and active)used in the manufacture of audio gear since the 80's. Count yourself blessed that you can hear the differences.
elevick
2,638 posts
 
The Yamaha may have a slight gain in only 2 channel. The big difference is dynamic headroom. It will have tons more power for bass and peaks.
Ag insider logo xs@2x
tsugury
251 posts
 
Although you don't say what speakers you are using it sounds like they are a better match for your yamaha. The quad is current limiting from what I read. TG
gonglee3 OP
304 posts
 
Thank you so much for the voice of experience !
I will try to hear newer units now...
More to discover