2. amps-preamps
  3. 1215476176

Brain Teaser: Biamp or biwire w/limited rack space

I have a turntable-based 2-ch. system that I'm upgrading from small sats and a powered sub (Mirage Omnisats) to full-range floorstanders with dual speaker inputs for bi-wiring or bi-amping (Mirage OMD-15).

Right now the little satellites are powered by a 70 wpc Amber Series 70 power amp, but I figure that if I'm taking the powered sub out, I'll need more power and current to bring out the bass in the Mirage floorstanders.

The subwoofer would be removed; part of the deal I made with the wife is that if I upgraded this far, the floorstanders would have enough bass that I'd remove the powered subwoofer so she could have the hearth back to decorate or appoint however she'd like.

Plus, even though I've been pretty successful blending subs with satellites, I'd like all the music to come from two speakers so I can get a time-cohesive sound anywhere in the room.

I have a rack space for the preamp (already occupied with one) and a rack space for an amp (currently occupied by the Amber). I also have to watch the budget, and want to keep the expenditure below around $600. Here are some options I'm considering:

1. Get a multi-channel amp and bi-amp from that. With this method, you know that all the drivers are getting the same quality signal with the same characteristics. With careful shopping I can get a used 5-channel Acurus or B&K for around $500.

2. Get a stereo high power, high current amp and just bi-wire. I've found that you can occasionally find a Parasound HCA-2200 II for around $600-700. I have no doubt that the HCA-2200 II could deliver the power, current, and ironclad control (damping factor > 1000 @ 20Hz!) of the low end.

3. Get a Cambridge Audio 640A integrated amp to replace the line stage currently occupying that rack space. Use the Cambridge's 75 wpc power section to drive the mid/tweets, and the high current Amber on the shelf below to drive the bass drivers. I am already using a Cambridge 640P phono stage, so I should have a great match at the turntable-to-line stage interface. I have also heard the 640A because I installed on in my neighbor's house. I think the 640A is almost worth its asking price as a line stage, but the power section is also impressive. These things are very fast and clean while becoming musical as they break in. And they have a headphone jack and aluminum-bodied remote control. Cosmetically, this would be an attractive solution; the silver-face Cambridge stuff is nice looking (WAF).

4. Don't buy any amp; take one of my non-operable VSP Labs TransMOS high current amps to the shop and get it fixed. They came along 10 years earlier, but sound and behave a lot like the Curl-designed Parasounds.

Soooo... what would you do? Pencils up!
johnnyb53
shadorne's avatar
Ag insider logo xs@2x
shadorne
7,470 posts
 
The OMD-15s are 91dB sensitive, which means that the Amber Series 70 amp should power them cleanly to 110dB and peaks to maybe 113.

110 db spl clean from a 5.5" woofer is rather a lot (assuming you sit 6 feet back) - are these pro type drivers and have you measured this? Very impressive!
johnnyb53 OP
3,510 posts
 
08-20-08: Shadorne
110 db spl clean from a 5.5" woofer is rather a lot (assuming you sit 6 feet back) - are these pro type drivers and have you measured this? Very impressive!
Are these drivers special? Yes. Have I measured? No. This was just an extrapolation, starting at the OMD-15's sensitivity rating of 91dB at 1w input and doubling the power for every 3dB increment until the Amber runs out of headroom. Mirage rates the power handling at 250w. Does this mean it can put out a clean 115 dB @ 1KHz at 1 meter? Probably not, but I feel safer with a speaker with a 250w max rating than an 80w one.

However, I will say that subjectively the bass performance on these speakers is outstanding. It's a 2-1/2 way system, so it's not just a single 5.5" driver handling the bass. When this loudspeaker dishes out with deep bass, it has 2 active 5.5" drivers in separate chambers, one reinforced by a passive radiator and the other by a slot-loaded down-firing port.

Furthermore, these drivers used a special patented "ribbed elliptical" surround originally developed for their powered subwoofers, that is said to maintain linearity while enabling more extreme excursions.

Does it work? I can't measure its excursion vs. linearity, but this 5.5" driver-based system offers up the most effortless, taut, clean, and extended bass I've ever heard from 5.5" drivers. The OMD-15 excels at revealing the nature and quality of the bass you're hearing. It's easy to identify if an upright bass in jazz was recorded with a mic or a contact transducer, whether Charlie Haden should have changed his strings that day, distinguishing tympani from bass drum in large scale orchestral crescendos, organ pedal tones, synth tones, round wound vs. flat wounds on an electric bass--you name it, the OMD-15 reveals it.

It's also particularly good at sorting out melodies and chords and interactions in the bass. I've played several recordings featuring outstanding bassists (Jaco Pastorius, Charlie Haden, Neils Orsted-Henning Pedersen, Ray Brown, etc.) and I get a greater sense of the bassist interacting with the rest of the musicians than before. This also holds true for what it does with left hand chords and bass lines on a 9' concert grand piano.

They play down to about 32 Hz, which is plenty for any music I throw at 'em. I couldn't believe how they fleshed out the big bass drum and gong (which has a low fundamental) on a CD of Copland's "Fanfare for the Common Man."

And it's doing all this powered by this 70 wpc Amber Series 70 amp I was afraid wouldn't do the job.
johnnyb53 OP
3,510 posts
 
08-20-08: Shadorne
110 db spl clean from a 5.5" woofer is rather a lot (assuming you sit 6 feet back) - are these pro type drivers and have you measured this? Very impressive!
I didn't measure; I was extrapolating the OMD-15's sensitivity of 91dB @ 1w input at 1KHz, doubling the power for every 3dB increment until the 70wpc Amber runs out of headroom.

The 5.5" drivers in this ARE special, though. They use a patented ribbed elliptical surround that Mirage developed for their subwoofers to maintain longer excursions without losing linearity. To me, a 5.5" woofer usually means "farty" when pushed, but that's not the case with these.

It's not a single 5.5" handling the bass. It's a 2-1/2 way system, and below 900 Hz there are two active 5.5" woofers in separately sealed chambers; the upper one is reinforced with a passive radiator, the lower one is in a much larger chamber and reinforced with a slot-loaded down-firing port.

Subjectively it works beyond my expectations. This is the highest quality bass I have ever had in my home, and I've seldom heard better in demos. The bass is clean, full, and articulate down to about 32Hz in-room, and these speakers easily sort out all types of bass sources--free-air microphone, transducer, flatwound or roundwound strings, synth, organ pedal tones, tympani, bass drum, gong fundamentals, etc. Most engaging is how they convey musical communication between bassists and the rest of the band or combo, interactions between bass and guitar, bass and left hand figures of a 9' concert grand piano, etc.

These little guys have better quality bass with their 5.5" drivers in a 35-lb. enclosure, driven by a 70wpc amp than my Mirage M5si's, which are 51" tall, weigh 85 lbs. ea. with two 6.5" woofers and 4" dia. ports biamped with a dedicated high current 200 wpc for the woofers.
johnnyb53 OP
3,510 posts
 
Woops! Sorry about the redundant posts. I thought my earlier one had gotten flushed when I did a system reset.
More to discover