Should I go to a Benchmark DAC1 pre in my system?


The magazine reviews rave about this device. Absolute Sound calls it revolutionary and says it compares very favorably to high end DCS equipment, which I've heard and liked.

How does it stack up against the competition as a pre-amp for both digital and analogue sources and as a DAC?

I believe I could run my Denon CD as a transport and my Roku Soundbridge directly into it, and add a phono-pre and connect my turntable as well. That would cover 99% of my current listening sources. I could also add a music server later via USB when ready.

Should I do it?
128x128mapman
Mapman - Benchmark DAC1 instead of dual PLL (phase lock loop) used in modern CD players to create stable clock for D/A converter locks to incoming clock using crude (but fast) single PLL and then reclocks data with separate high quality clock. This operation is performed at equivalent of 1 milion times oversampling (equivalent to 44GHz). Normaly this would not be possible but a lot (most) of samples are repeats. In order to place output samples to D/A converter in the right moment it performs statistical analysis of the clock's frequency to 5ps accurate and digital filtering of the signal. 24-bit 192kHz sigma delta D/A converter (extra bits come from averages obtained by digital filtering)is driven only at 100k to limit THD (higher at 192kHz). It is pretty sophisticated operation.

There are two schools in audio - to oversample or not to oversample, matter of personal preference. Non oversampling require good transport, expensive digital cables and in general are less flexible. Oversampling asynchronous reclocking brings benefit of jitter rejection. Jitter is basically noise but in the time domain. It converts to noise in the D/A converter. Jitter might also be created when converting old analog recordings to digital tapes using poor unstable clock, like it happened at the beginning of digital. Jitter caused by media/electronics/cables can be removed (reclocked data) but jitter already recorded stays forever. Many older recordings got wasted that way and the quality of the first CDs was "not the greatest" (to avoid profanities). I've heard (might be a rumor) that they digitized analog tapes that contained frequncy correction fo printing LP resulting in extremely bright sounding CDs.

Getting back to Benchmark: it allows me to use cheap transport - $70 Sony DVD player to connect HDTV with toslink and to get CD/DVD sound with coax. DVD players usualy have bad quality analog outputs but very good tracking and have inherently built in MP3 decoder. Some of them play DVD-Audio or SACD (converted to S/PDIF).
And they back it up with a 30 day no question's asked guarantee. Buy direct. Try it. If you're like me, you'll keep it. I have the USB version connected to my MacMini media server (1300 cds) in lossless digital format, along with a couple dozen vinyl records in 24/96 format.

It's easy to get all hung up on specs, I say try it.

BTW, mine is connected into a BAT VK-300xSE via balanced cables. MacMini feeds Dac1 via USB. DVD player feeds Dac1 via COAX.
Cjnolan - good advice: buy direct! I bought my DAC1 direct in spite of lower total price at Sweetwater (same price but free shipping). Buying direct gives better support and most likely newest revision. Buying used is a little bit risky since early Benchmarks DAC1 had some problems (thin sounding amps and very high output impedance on RCA outputs).
The Benchmark is a remarkable converter. Its sound is extraordinarily, achingly clear when used with equal or better-quality gear. It is a presentation that, completely personally, I find fascinating but more concerned with musical details and structure than with musical flow and emotion. Having compared it at a friend's house with my Apogee Mini-DAC, I can say that both have their qualities, and the Mini-DAC's are the ones I would choose to live with long term. This is not to say the Benchmark is a bad unit, no indeed. Far from it, it is quite remarkable and it may be exactly to your taste.
"Far from it, it is quite remarkable and it may be exactly to your taste."

This would be my only concern at this point.

The 30 day home trial would work to address this concern for me giving me a chance to find out for myself.

My gut feel is that I would want to give a device reputed to do things in an accurate and detailed manner a try first, especially if there is little financial risk.

Then if it doesn't float my boat, I know what directions I might go in from there, given that I've heard a variety of both tube and SS based systems that sound different but good, each of which has unique merits.

Also, I run 6 different pairs of speakers in my house concurrently. As long as my source is doing things well, I have some flexibility there regarding what speakers I use in various listening rooms to provide somewhat different flavors of listening without having to change core components in the system too often.