Martin Colloms addressed the question of class D amps in a recent HIFICRITIC. He concluded that their designers were ignoring factors that had always been considered important, listing 19 of them. He concluded, among other things:
What this means:
I consider that elements of the audio industry have exaggerated the need for High Fidelity enthusiasts to adopt Class D amplification.
The claimed efficiency advantage is largely valueless except to save for heat sinks for very large sub woofer amplifiers.
High frequency and radio frequency noise is a vital issue and has not been sufficiently addressed with Class D designs. Class D amplifiers conduct and radiate substantial wide frequency range noise, both correlated and de-correlated.
We know that high frequency noise degrades both the sound quality of the connected audio system and the amplifier itself.
HIFICRITIC:Are Class D Amplifiers High Fidelity?
Other parts of this are on the HIFICRITIC web site.
What this means:
I consider that elements of the audio industry have exaggerated the need for High Fidelity enthusiasts to adopt Class D amplification.
The claimed efficiency advantage is largely valueless except to save for heat sinks for very large sub woofer amplifiers.
High frequency and radio frequency noise is a vital issue and has not been sufficiently addressed with Class D designs. Class D amplifiers conduct and radiate substantial wide frequency range noise, both correlated and de-correlated.
We know that high frequency noise degrades both the sound quality of the connected audio system and the amplifier itself.
HIFICRITIC:Are Class D Amplifiers High Fidelity?
Other parts of this are on the HIFICRITIC web site.