ICE Amps for classical music?


I listen to classical orchestral music at heavy volume. I detest reproduced music for always sounding more or less electronic and not acoustic. Real music is beautiful in a way reproduced music--so far at least-- never is. I have become curious about Wyred4sound amps because of low price and high watts. I am wondering if any of you "mostly classical" listeners have heard these amps and feel they do no more damage to music than amps which are NOT ICE amps. I am using a Plinius SA100 now and have used a VAC 100/100,
a Bedini Classic 100/100, a Music Reference RM-9, and other tube and solid state amps. They all had their pluses and minuses, of course, but for least electronic, clearly the Bedini was the winner. So what about ICE amps?
rpfef
Guidocorona is correct. No ICE amp will sound very good in the first 100 hours, with optimum playing delayed for 100s of hours.

Besides the need for a NOS DAC, a good ICE amp will never sound clear unless the whispiest insulated SC is used.

Class D is not deficient. Our understanding of class D is deficient.
The choice for an NOS or upsampling D/A Converter is purely subjective and a personal choice contrary to a previous post which is erroneous and disingenuous as well.

Some folks prefer NOS while others prefer upsampling; it's vanilla or chocolate. Neither is right or wrong.

The amplifier with regards to your choice of D/A Converters is, of course, irrelevant.

Also incorrect is the "whispiest insulated speaker cable" advice. Choose the speaker cable that suits your ears and system. It's that simple.
Hello Gents ,

1. The Bel canto was not mine and is well broken in , it has been in this system for more than a yr and replaced a Krell
KSA 250 .

2. It was being driven by an ARC - SS not tubes ..

3. The difference was not maybe, let's try again , it was night and day , the Bel Canto had a very hard sound by comparison to the threshold. The opinions i had voiced previously were shared by all including the owner of the bel canto .

4. I would believe those that do not hear this hardness may have speakers that are not very revealing in the upper registers and if so , then i can see very good mating with the Bel canto.

5. The bass was hands down better on the Threshold , the Bel Canto bass was muddy and never had the extension.

6. As i had said previously , the Bel canto was more extended on the top and was more open , but we all felt it did so at the expense of sounding very grainy and hard by comparison. The more one listened , the less you were inclined to go back....

Again very unusual everyone in the room came to the same conclusion , 3 off the 5, own class-d , i can state without reservation "we" never expected this result , well not such an unanimous decision .

The model Bel Canto? 500M

Regards,
Audiofefeil, Upsampling, perhaps. Oversampling NO. I have proved that here many times to various people to their satisfaction. Class D is nothing like any tube or solid state amp;

Every cable that has gone through here have announced themselves according to their insulation regardless of price. They produce a haze of white noise on a fine Class D system.

These are not a matter of choice for class D owners. They are a matter of realistic sound versus poor hifi, as the Weseixas test with Sony exemplified.

I stand by my words, and your countering does no good to those who choose class D amps.

You are a dealer, your rant exposing motive.
Bill, inadvertently you have used a term that can be interpreted as a remark "ad hominem".. .

From the American heritage Dictionary:
1. disingenuous. adjective. Not straightforward or candid; insincere or calculating: "an ambitious, disingenuous, philistine, and hypocritical operator, who ... exemplified ... the most disagreeable traits of his time"
(David Cannadine).

I am of course positive you did not mean any of it. I am sure you agree that we should maintain the most urbane level of discourse on this board.

Thanks for your help, Guido