yeah I thought I mentioned it before but maybe I overlooked it...
The reality is that maybe not bass guitar, Piano but explosions in movies, electronic/new age music-bass tones, keyboard bass and of course pipe organs do go that low and have that much bass. It's the only unreal and inconsistant sounding range of frequencies in my system.
I think that the folks suggesting more power may be right, I thought that myself. I adressed it with the vendor I purchased from in the first place and he assured me there was plenty of power in the very under rated arcam.
"It's a real continuous 65watts, more like a minimum" is what he said. As opposed to my old Rotel (130watts) was an exagerated power rating. The only difference I heard was the Rotel was more grainy and the Arcam more real and lifelike.
You know at one point I was thinking about bi-amping but I don't know how that is achieved with the Krell Pre I have.
Thanks for all your input so far. any one else got a comment I'm all ears. I should have asked here first, a year ago!
Cheers
Rich
The reality is that maybe not bass guitar, Piano but explosions in movies, electronic/new age music-bass tones, keyboard bass and of course pipe organs do go that low and have that much bass. It's the only unreal and inconsistant sounding range of frequencies in my system.
I think that the folks suggesting more power may be right, I thought that myself. I adressed it with the vendor I purchased from in the first place and he assured me there was plenty of power in the very under rated arcam.
"It's a real continuous 65watts, more like a minimum" is what he said. As opposed to my old Rotel (130watts) was an exagerated power rating. The only difference I heard was the Rotel was more grainy and the Arcam more real and lifelike.
You know at one point I was thinking about bi-amping but I don't know how that is achieved with the Krell Pre I have.
Thanks for all your input so far. any one else got a comment I'm all ears. I should have asked here first, a year ago!
Cheers
Rich